Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Hume, Passion, and Action

Bibliographic Data

ID8085295
AuthorsElizabeth S Radcliffe (0000-0002-5447-3458, corresponding author)
Year2018
Pages240
Publication date2018-06-21
Open AccessNo
TypeBOOK
VenueHume, Passion, and Action (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/oso/9780199573295.001.0001
OpenAlexW2808803000
Open LibraryOL30599643M
ISBN9780199573295
LanguageEN
Citations received10

David Hume’s theory of action is well known for several provocative theses, including that passion and reason cannot be opposed over the direction of action. In Hume, Passion, and Action , the author defends an original interpretation of Hume’s views on passion, reason, and motivation that is consistent with other theses in Hume’s philosophy, loyal to his texts, and historically situated. This book challenges the now orthodox interpretation of Hume on motivation, presenting an alternative that situates Hume closer to “Humeans” than many recent interpreters have. Part of the strategy is to examine the thinking of the early modern intellectuals to whom Hume responds. Most of these thinkers insisted that passions lead us to pursue harmful objects unless regulated by reason; and most regarded passions as representations of good and evil, which can be false. Understanding Hume’s response to these claims requires appreciating his respective characterizations of reason and passion. The author argues that Hume’s thesis that reason is practically impotent apart from passion is about beliefs generated by reason, rather than about the capacity of reason. Furthermore, the argument makes sense of Hume’s sometimes-ridiculed description of passions as “original existences” having no reference to objects. The author also shows how Hume understood morality as intrinsically motivating, while holding that moral beliefs are not themselves motives, and why he thought of passions as self-regulating, contrary to the admonitions of the rationalists

Action (physics · Argument (complex analysis · Epistemology · Interpretation (philosophy · Morality · Passion · Passions · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Psychology · Act (philosophy) · david Hume (1711-1776) · Emotions · Philosophy · Social Psychology

  • The Role of Philosophy in Hume’s Critique of Empire

    Open Access•Elena Yi-Jia Zeng•International Journal of…•2023

  • Hume and the Cognitive Phenomenology of Belief

    Open Access•Kengo Miyazono•Canadian Journal of Philosophy•2023

  • Self-Knowledge and Hume's Phenomenology of the Passions

    Open Access•Margaret Watkins•Philosophy•2021

  • Recognizing Resentment

    M Schwarze•Recognizing Resentment•2020

  • Hutcheson's Contributions to Action Theory

    Open Access•Elizabeth S Radcliffe•Journal of Scottish Philosophy•2022

  • Hume's General Point of View, Smith's Impartial Spectator, and the Moral Value of Interacting with Outsiders

    Open Access•John Mchugh•Journal of Scottish Philosophy•2021

  • Hutcheson and the Stoics on Emotion Regulation

    Open Access•Eric Entrican Wilson•Journal of Scottish Philosophy•2025

  • Instrumental Rationality in the Social Sciences

    Open Access•Katharina Nieswandt•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•2024

  • Outlines of a neo-Humean disjunctivism

    Open Access•Olof Leffler•Synthese•2025

  • A Humean explanation of acting on normative reasons

    Open Access•Elizabeth S Radcliffe•Synthese•2021

Unique citing works10
Citations per year1,67
Citation span2020 - 2025 (6)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 10

Tools

Open DOILibgen
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae