Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Is’–‘Ought’ Derivations and Ethical Taxonomies

Bibliographic Data

ID8090278
AuthorsHill (0000-0001-7042-8318, corresponding author)
Year2008
Volume36
Issue4
Pages545-566
Publication date2008-04-16
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuephiloSOPHIA (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2155-0905 • E-ISSN: 2155-0891
PublisherSpringer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1007/s11406-008-9131-y
OpenAlexW1990067638
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited11

Argument (complex analysis · Counterexample · Epistemology · Ethical theories · Linguistics · Metaphysics · Philosophy of language · Philosophy of mind · Philosophy of science · Premise · Sentence · Taxonomy (biology · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Mathematics · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Philosophy

  • The Limits of Self-Effacement

    Open Access•Patrick Clipsham•Philosophical Studies•2021

  • A study in philosophical taxonomy

    Open Access•I L Humberstone, Lloyd Humberstone•Philosophical Studies•1996

  • Logic and the autonomy of ethics

    Charles Pigden, Charles R Pigden•Australasian Journal of Philosophy•1989

  • The Is-Ought Problem

    Open Access•Gerhard Schurz•Is-Ought Problem•1997

  • How to Derive "Ought" From "Is

    John R Searle•The Philosophical Review•1964

Citations per year0.2
Citation span2021 - 2021 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae