Broome on Fairness and Lotteries
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 8093421 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Hugh Lazenby (autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2014 |
| Volumen | 26 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 331-345 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2014-07-25 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Utilitas (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0953-8208 • E-ISSN: 1741-6183 |
| Editorial | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0953820814000107 |
| OpenAlex | W2029639869 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 12 |
| Referencias citadas | 5 |
John Broome argues that when all claims cannot be perfectly fairly satisfied in outcome, the contribution to fairness from entering claims into a lottery, and so providing them some surrogate satisfaction, ought to be weighed against, and can outweigh, what fairness can be achieved directly in outcome. I argue that this is a mistake. Instead, I suggest that any contribution to fairness from entering claims into a lottery is lexically posterior to fairness in outcome
Economics · Lottery · Microeconomics · Mistake · Outcome (game theory · Political science · Free Will and Agency · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Law
How to be absolutely fair Part II
How to be absolutely fair Part I
To be fair
A theory of fairness from consistency
Fairness and close personal relationships
How to be fairer
Risk and the Unfairness of Some Being Better Off at the Expense of Others
Dividing the indivisible
Fairness and Aggregation
Fairness and randomness in decision-making
Treating Broome Fairly
Allocative Fairness
| Obras citantes distintas | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1,09 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2015 - 2026 (12) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 12 |