The Collapse of Virtue Ethics
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8097091 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Brad Hooker (0000-0003-1164-6328, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2002 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 22-40 |
| Publication date | 2002-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Utilitas (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0953-8208 • E-ISSN: 1741-6183 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s095382080000337x |
| OpenAlex | W2109461690 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 6 |
Virtue ethics is normally taken to be an alternative to consequentialist and Kantian moral theories. I shall discuss what I think is the most interesting version of virtue ethics – Rosalind Hursthouse's. I shall then argue that her version is inadequate in ways that suggest revision in the direction of a kind of rule-consequentialism
Consequentialism · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Normative ethics · Sociology · Virtue · Virtue ethics · Ethics in medical practice · Free Will and Agency · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy
Two Dilemmas in Virtue Ethics and How Zhu Xi’s Neo-Confucianism Avoids Them
Hooker on Rule-Consequentialism and Virtue
Contemporary virtue ethics and action-guiding objections
Neo-Aristotelian Naturalism and the Indeterminacy Objection
Anscombe on the Sources of Normativity
Philippa Foot's Virtue Ethics Has an Achilles' Heel
The epistemology of moral disagreement
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,35 |
| Citation span | 2006 - 2018 (13) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |