Bringing bodies into planning

Visceral methods, fear and gender violence

Bibliographic Data

ID8097808
AuthorsElizabeth L Sweet (0000-0002-9300-2448, Temple University, corresponding author), Sara Ortiz Escalante (0000-0002-6375-3865, University of British Columbia, Canada; Col·lectiu Punt 6, Barcelona, Spain)
Year2014
Volume52
Issue10
Pages1826-1845
Publication date2014-07-11
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueUrban Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0042-0980 • E-ISSN: 1360-063X
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0042098014541157
OpenAlexW2161260693
LanguageEN
Citations received99
References cited63

Planning has been ineffective at addressing women’s fear of violence and violence against women in part because of the false public/private divide. This divide is parallel and mutually supported by parochial and conservative understandings of male and female gender constructions and norms in spaces and social structural systems. We propose exploring the actual spaces of bodies and planning at the scale of bodies since bodies are at the nexus of public–private spaces, gender identities and gender violence. Using bodies as geographical spaces to understand and analyse visceral experiences and fear of violence may help diminish the dominance of the public–private divide and challenge the unequal rights women have to use space. Based on exploratory workshops in New York City, Mexico City and Barcelona as well as research events in Medellin, we share our experiences using visceral methods including body-map storytelling and shared sensory spatial experiences, also evaluating their usefulness. We examine the ethics of visceral methods, ways to analyse body-mapped data and the use of planners’ bodies as tools in research and practice. We conclude that bodies have the potential to become a source of dynamic and reflective information that might be effectively used by planners and communities to make places better and safer

Criminology · Dominance (genetics · Fear of crime · Nexus (standard · Political science · Public relations · Public space · Sociology · Engineering · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Participatory Visual Research Methods · Psychology · Urban Green Space and Health · Gender Studies · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub