L'évaluation de l'action éducative comme apprentissage et négociation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8113192 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lise Demailly (0000-0003-4690-6652, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2003 |
| Volume | 142 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 115-129 |
| Publication date | 2003-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Revue française de pédagogie (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0556-7807 • E-ISSN: 2105-2913 |
| Publisher | PERSEE Program (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3406/rfp.2003.2938 |
| OpenAlex | W1999037279 |
| Language | FR |
| Citations received | 9 |
The author states that teachers and headteachers are usually opposed to school evaluation and to the evaluation of their work through the evaluation of pupils achievement. She thinks about the dynamics of the resistance and the theoretical framework of its conception. First, assessment practice is considered as a strategy where relations of power and interest are at stake ; second it is a political process implying struggles between various conceptions of the world and projects to organize the society ; third, it is a cognitive process producing knowledge. The article presents a case study which shows the importance orbeing confident in the availability of an evaluation process which actually affects practices and representations. On the basis of this evaluation, it is possible to negotiate collaborative learning. However we may understand why teachers are so reluctant to accept technicist forms of evaluation : there is a gap between them and their subjective conditions of professional practice
Business · Cognition · Epistemology · Negotiation · Political science · Politics · Resistance (ecology · Social science · Sociology · Valuation (finance · Education, sociology, and vocational training · Educational Practices and Policies · Philosophy, Sociology, Political Theory · Psychology · Law · Philosophy
National testing in education in France
Une recherche documentaire sur les politiques, les pratiques et les principes directeurs d’évaluation des élèves du système scolaire public (1re à 12e année) des provinces de l’Ouest canadien
Effets théoriques et réels des politiques d'évaluation standardisée
Interactions recherche-communauté éducative
Note de conjoncture. Autonomie des établissements et justice en éducation
Responsable, mais pas redevable ? Gouvernance par les résultats et relations d’“accountability” dans les établissements scolaires en France
De la mesure à l'évaluation collaborative en éducation
En Europe
La politique ZEP, laboratoire de nouveaux outils de pilotage du système éducatif (1981-2001)
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,45 |
| Citation span | 2006 - 2020 (15) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |