Environmental Justice, Vital Materiality, and the Toxic Sublime in Edward Burtynsky’s Manufactured Landscapes
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8123750 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sarah Jaquette Ray (Cal Poly Humboldt, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 203-219 |
| Publication date | 2016-01-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | GeoHumanities (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2373-5678 • E-ISSN: 2373-566X |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/2373566x.2016.1167615 |
| OpenAlex | W2358767620 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
| References cited | 20 |
Manufactured Landscapes, the 2006 film directed by Jennifer Baichwal, is a documentary portrayal of the work of Canadian photographer Edward Burtynsky. The film explores Burtynsky as he documents sites of extraction, factory production, and waste disposal around the world. This article provides an environmental justice reading of the film and the photographs. It focuses on representations of materiality, such as how the bodies of workers interact with the environmental toxins with and in which they work, and the limits of an aesthetics of beauty to account for global consumer complicity and risk. Burtynsky’s deployment of a “toxic sublime” (Peeples 2011) and the film’s depiction of vital materiality ask audiences to reckon with the “dirty ecologies” (Morton 2009) of risk society’s “storied matter” (Bennett 2010), such as oil, e-waste, and invisible toxic fumes. Burtynsky’s photographs foreground toxicity in ways that suggest that “beauty” is not a grounds for environmentalism in the Anthropocene, colluding with a paradigm of “health” that evades the “trans-corporeality” (Alaimo 2010) of human bodies. Moreover, attachment to beauty and health might, in fact, ironically engender toxicity. Through the film, Burtynsky’s works make visible the externalized costs of global consumerism to very specific bodies and very specific environments, and draw audiences materially into relation with those costs, emphasizing what is termed in this article a material relationality. The author concludes that, despite eliciting sharp scholarly criticism, the film and Burtynsky’s photographs call for an aesthetic sensibility and form capable of revealing how materialism facilitates global environmental justice
Aesthetics · Anthropocentrism · Art · Beauty · Complicity · Consumerism · Depiction · Ecocriticism · Environmental ethics · Environmental justice · Environmentalism · Epistemology · Literature · Materialism · Materiality (auditing · Political science · Politics · Sensibility · Sociology · Sublime · Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Law · Philosophy · Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
Anthropocene Sublimes. An Introduction
Documenting the Anthropocene
Environmental aesthetics
Making dead elephants speak
A Collision between Beauty and Ugliness”
Reimagining Waste
Tailings and tracings
An Australian agri-industrial landscape sublime
Routine Exposures
The Toxic Sublime
Reimagining landscape
Tar Remedies
Re-envisioning the Toxic Sublime
Risk Society
Bodily Natures
Ecology without Nature
Oceanic Origins, Plastic Activism, and New Materialism at Sea
Edward Burtynsky's Manufactured Landscapes
Toxic Sublime
Atrocity Aesthetics
Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor
The tactile topologies of Contagion
Sense of Place and Sense of Planet
Risk society
Animacies
The Trouble with Wilderness
The Body as an Accumulation Strategy
Situated Knowledges
Visualizing the Anthropocene
Toxic Discourse
| Unique citing works | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,44 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2026 (10) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 13 |