Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Assessment Techniques Corresponding to Scientific Texts in Commercial Reading Programs

Do They Promote Scientific Literacy

Bibliographic Data

ID8158026
AuthorsLinda M Phillips (University of Alberta), Stephen P Norris (University of Alberta), Martha L Smith (University of Alberta), Jodi Buker (University of Alberta), Chandra Kasper (University of Alberta)
Year2010
Volume55
Issue4
Pages435-452
Publication date2010-05-20
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAlberta Journal of Educational Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-4805 • E-ISSN: 1923-1857
PublisherUniversity of Alberta Press (PUBLISHER • CA)
DOI10.55016/ojs/ajer.v55i4.55338
OpenAlexW2103198653
LanguageEN
References cited5

This research is part of a larger study of commercial reading programs used in Canada in grades 1-6. The specific purposes of the results reported here were to identify and quantify the assessment techniques suggested for the selections that contain scientific content, to show how the assessments differ by grade, to evaluate the nature and quality of the assessments, and to examine the extent to which the assessments help foster scientific literacy. It was found that the assessments occurred in six major forms and employed about a dozen assessment tools that engage students in nearly 20 tasks. Such variety is endorsed in both literacy and science education position statements. The assessments showed some weak trends by grade, but primarily left the purpose of the assessments to teachers’ judgment. The consequence is that teachers probably will choose the assessments for formative rather than summative evaluation, an approach also endorsed by literacy and science education policy statements. Hardly any of the assessments focused on the specificities of learning to read texts that are scientific such as interpreting descriptions of methods and research findings and thus had limited use in promoting this particular aspect of scientific literacy

Formative assessment · Literacy · Mathematics education · Medical education · Pedagogy · Political science · Quality (philosophy) · Reading (process) · Science education · Scientific Literacy · Summative assessment · Variety (cybernetics) · Computer Science · Medicine · Psychology · Science Education and Pedagogy · Student Assessment and Feedback · Teacher Education and Leadership Studies

  • School science constrained

    Open Access•Patricia M Rowell, Margaretha Ebbers•Teaching and Teacher Education•2004

  • The need for change in elementary school teacher training—a cross-college age study of future teachers’ conceptions of basic astronomy concepts

    Open Access•Ricardo Trumper•Teaching and Teacher Education•2003

  • Do Teachers Support Causal Understanding through their Discourse when Teaching Primary Science

    Open Access•Douglas P Newton, Lynn D Newton•British Educational Research…•2000

  • Principles for literacy assessment

    Open Access•Peter H Johnston, Peter Johnston et al.•Reading Research Quarterly•2005

  • Teachers' Beliefs About the Nature of Science and Their Relationship to Classroom Practice

    Open Access•Nancy W Brickhouse•Journal of Teacher Education•1990

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae