Randomized Evaluation of a Supplemental Grade-Wide Mathematics Intervention
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8220979 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Amanda Vanderheyden (Education Research & Consulting, Inc), Amanda M Vanderheyden (corresponding author), Tara McLaughlin (0000-0001-9841-9843), James Algina (0000-0001-6924-655X), Patricia Snyder (0000-0003-3325-9732, University of Florida) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 1251-1284 |
| Publication date | 2012-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Educational Research Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-8312 • E-ISSN: 1935-1011 |
| Publisher | American Educational Research Association (AERA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3102/0002831212462736 |
| OpenAlex | W2098852034 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 36 |
A randomized controlled trial was used to evaluate the effects of a supplemental mathematics intervention that emphasized fluency building for computations and procedures. All fourth- and fifth-grade English-speaking students from a single school district who were participating in general education mathematics instruction and had a 2009 year-end accountability score were included in the study ( N = 537). Assignment to intervention or control conditions occurred at the classroom level with roughly half of classes being assigned to intervention and half being assigned to control conditions within each school. Outcome measures included the 2009 year-end statewide accountability measure in mathematics as well as three computation curriculum-based measurement probes of mathematics administered on three occasions during the school year. Implementation integrity data were collected in intervention classrooms via direct observation, teacher surveys, and monitoring of permanent products. Multilevel linear modeling (MLM) analysis was used to evaluate the effect of the intervention on student mathematics outcomes for all students and for students who were low performing at baseline. Intervention effects were detected at both grade levels (but not on all outcome measures). MLM was also used to evaluate the mediating effect of intervention implementation integrity on intervention effects. The integrity with which the intervention was implemented in intervention classrooms predicted end-of-year standardized measures of mathematics achievement and growth on curriculum-based measures. Implications for mathematics instruction in general and mathematics intervention within response to intervention models are discussed
Accountability · Curriculum · Curriculum development · Curriculum-based measurement · Fluency · Intervention (counseling · Mathematics education · Medical education · Multilevel model · Pedagogy · Randomized controlled trial · Response to Intervention · Special education · Statistics · Behavioral and Psychological Studies · Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills · Disability Education and Employment · Mathematics · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology
A systematic literature review of math interventions across educational settings from early childhood education to high school
The impact of intervention modality on students' multiplication fact fluency
A cost-effectiveness analysis of classwide math intervention
Program records as a source for program implementation assessment and youth outcomes predictors during residential care
Knowing and Teaching Elementary Mathematics
Quality Indicators for Group Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research in Special Education
Defining, Conceptualizing, and Measuring Fidelity of Implementation and Its Relationship to Outcomes in K–12 Curriculum Intervention Research
A new look at the statistical model identification
Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models
Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement
Hierarchical linear models
Breaking the structuralist barrier
Breaking the structuralist barrier
The Cost-Effectiveness of Five Policies for Improving Student Achievement
Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,36 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2024 (10) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |