The Fallacy of a Pseudo-Replication Hypothesis Testing Procedure
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8222652 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Paul A Games (Pennsylvania State University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1971 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 379-383 |
| Publication date | 1971-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Educational Research Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-8312 • E-ISSN: 1935-1011 |
| Publisher | American Educational Research Association (AERA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3102/00028312008002379 |
| OpenAlex | W1976268198, W4240019396 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 5 |
Carver (1970) has objected to some results of Natkin and Stahler (1968) that are intuitively unappealing to him. He finds the effect they report incredible (p. 286) and then states .. rather than presenting extensive analysis of variance tables, Natkin and Stahler would have built a better case if they had broken their groups in half and had reported the statistical results from both groups. (p. 286) Since he also states .. replication is necessary for confirming hypothesis . (p. 285), one may infer that the decision-making process Carver is recommending is as follows
Econometrics · Economics · Epistemology · Fallacy · Mathematical economics · Replication (statistics · Statistical analysis · Statistical hypothesis testing · Statistics · Variance (accounting · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Computer Science · Crime Patterns and Interventions · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|