Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Programed Instruction versus Usual Classroom Procedures in Teaching Boys to Read

Bibliographic Data

ID8222872
AuthorsJOHN D McNEIL (University of California, Los Angeles, corresponding author)
Year1964
Volume1
Issue2
Pages113-119
Publication date1964-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Educational Research Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-8312 • E-ISSN: 1935-1011
PublisherAmerican Educational Research Association (AERA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.3102/00028312001002113
OpenAlexW2072941654, W4235313565
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited2

It is commonly observed that more boys than girls are unsuccessful in beginning reading (Gates, 1961; Alden, Sullivan, and Durrell, 1941). Although the real cause for the failure of boys to achieve as much as girls is unknown, various theories have been proposed. Factors of growth, maturation, and development are considered most critical by some (Gallagher, 1948; Monroe, 1932). Others have stated that the reading interests of boys and girls differ and that existing instructional content appeals more to girls (Heilman, 1961). Negative treatment of male learners by female teachers has been suggested as another explanation for the slow progress of boys in reading (St. John, 1932; Davidson and Lang, 1960). A previously untried approach to the collection of evidence regarding the inferiority of boys in beginning reading is through programed instruction. This technique offers increased control by standardizing the conditions under which reading material is presented to boys and girls and insuring that all have equal opportunities to respond. The present study compares the learning of boys and girls under the controlled conditions of programed instruction with the learning of these same children under direct instruction by female teachers. The possibility is explored that classroom teachers treat boys and girls differently and that this difference in treatment is associated with differences in early reading achievement. The specific hypothesis is: whereas boys excel in beginning reading under the neutral conditions of programed instruction, these same boys will not maintain their superiority when placed under the direction of female teachers. Further, it is hypothesized that (a) boys will be perceived by their classmates as receiving more negative comments from teachers and as having fewer opportunities to respond in their reading groups than girls and (b) reading progress will be related to teachers' comments and to opportunities to respond

Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Teaching method · African Education and Politics · Computer Science · Education and Technology Integration · Psychology · Reading and Literacy Development · School Choice and Performance

  • Learning to Read

    Robert C Calfee, Priscilla A Drum•Curriculum Inquiry•1978

  • Academic and Behavioral Problems of Boys in Elementary School

    Open Access•Robert B Chapman•The Counseling Psychologist•1978

  • A Critique of a Research Report

    Robert B Ingle, William J Gephart•American Educational Research…•1966

  • Teacher Behavior toward Boys and Girls during First Grade Reading Instruction

    Open Access•O L Davis, June Jenkinson Slobodian•American Educational Research…•1967

Citations per year0.07
Citation span1966 - 1978 (13)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae