Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Conflict Theory and Sex Differences on the CMAS

Bibliographic Data

ID8224156
AuthorsBeeman N Phillips (The University of Texas, corresponding author)
Year1966
Volume3
Issue1
Pages19
Publication date1966-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Educational Research Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-8312 • E-ISSN: 1935-1011
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2307/1162023
OpenAlexW4238803398, W2052424303
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited5

Widely used questionnaire measures of anxiety, including the Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale (McCandless and Castaneda, 1956) and the Test Anxiety Scale for Children (Sarason, and others, 1960), generally have used items which are answered yes or no, and which are so worded that agreement (i.e., a yes response) indicates anxiety. In the use of such questionnaires boys have consistently obtained lower scores than girls, and one way this result has been interpreted is to assume that boys are more defensive than girls (e.g., Sarason, and others, 1960). In this view it is argued that anxiety is ego-alien to boys because the behaviors and traits which characterize masculinity are more incompatible with manifestations of anxiety. The result is that boys are less willing to admit anxiety and have a greater tendency to give no responses where yes responses would ordinarily be given. In support of this contention indirect and circumstantial evidence has been obtained by the construction of a defensiveness scale (e.g., Hill, 1963). In the present study school situations in which anxiety questionnaires are given were viewed in terms of conflict theory (Lewin, 1954), and evidence of defensiveness was sought more directly through an analysis of actual responses to items of the CMAS. It was assumed that in responding to items of anxiety questionnaires subjects experience two generally incompatible motives. There is reason to believe that most children have a desire to cooperate with those administering anxiety questionnaires in school, but in view of the content of items of anxiety questionnaires it is likely that reporting on oneself is anxiety-producing. Thus, in terms of conflict theory it appears that this is a situation in which both approach and avoidance motivation is aroused, and conflict exists when the anxiety created by the prospect of admitting something about oneself equals the desire to cooperate and to report on oneself. Further, if it is assumed that approach motivation usually is stronger than avoidance motivation, then conflict will be produced in only a small proportion of the items, and these are likely to be the items which are the best indicators of anxiety

Anxiety · Circumstantial evidence · Criminology · Developmental psychology · Econometrics · Economics · Psychiatry · Scale (ratio · Sociology · Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development · Clinical Psychology · Early Childhood Education and Development · Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Interventions in Relation to Anxiety in School

    Beeman N Phillips, Roy P Martin et al.•Anxiety: current trends in theory…•1972

  • Anxiety in elementary school children

    Seymour B Sarason, Kenneth S Davidson et al.•1960

  • Carmichael's manual of child psychology.

    Leonard Carmichael•Carmichael's manual of child…•1970

  • A factor analysis of? scores

    Allen L Edwards, James A Walsh•Journal of Abnormal & Social…•1964

Citations per year0.02
Citation span1972 - 1972 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae