Broad consent under the GDPR
An optimistic perspective on a bright future
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8248641 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Dara Hallinan (0000-0002-1160-821X, FIZ Karlsruhe – Leibniz Institute for Information Infrastructure, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1-1 |
| Publication date | 2020-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Life Sciences Society and Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2195-7819 • E-ISSN: 2195-7819 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1186/s40504-019-0096-3 |
| PMID | 31903508 |
| OpenAlex | W2997106421 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
| References cited | 17 |
Broad consent – the act of gaining one consent for multiple potential future research projects – sits at the core of much current genomic research practice. Since the 25th May 2018, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has applied as valid law concerning genomic research in the EU and now occupies a dominant position in the legal landscape. Yet, the position of the GDPR concerning broad consent has recently been cause for concern in the genomic research community. Whilst the text of the GDPR apparently supports the practice, recent jurisprudence contains language which is decidedly less positive. This article takes an in-depth look at the situation concerning broad consent under the GDPR and – despite the understandable concern flowing from recent jurisprudence – offers a positive outlook. This positive outlook is argued from three perspectives, each of which is significant in defining the current, and ongoing, legitimacy and utility of broad consent under the GDPR: the principled, the legal technical, and the practical
Alternative medicine · Business · Engineering ethics · Informed consent · Jurisprudence · Law and economics · Legitimacy · Political science · Sociology · Biomedical Ethics and Regulation · Computer Science · Engineering · Ethics in Clinical Research · Law · Medicine · Patient Dignity and Privacy
Big Data and the Deterioration of Consent Principle to Protect Health Data Privacy in Malaysia
No recognised ethical standards, no broad consent
Moral autonomy of patients and legal barriers to a possible duty of health related data sharing
Evaluating models of consent in changing health research environments
Controversies between regulations of research ethics and protection of personal data
Biobank consent under the GDPR
Can Blockchain Solve the Dilemma in the Ethics of Genomic Biobanks
Personal Data Protection in the Decision-Making of the CJEU Before and After the Lisbon Treaty
Research under the GDPR – a level playing field for public and private sector research
Big Tech platforms in health research
The value of consent for biobanking
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,2 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2024 (4) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 11 |