Pop-Up’ Governance
Developing internal governance frameworks for consortia: the example of UK10K
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8248671 |
|---|---|
| Authors | UK10K UK10K (University of Oxford, corresponding author), Jonathan Kaye (0000-0002-7311-4725, Wellcome Sanger Institute), Jane Kaye, Dawn Muddyman (Wellcome Sanger Institute), Carol Smee (Wellcome Sanger Institute), Karen Kennedy (0000-0002-8312-1494, University of Oxford), Jessica Bell (0000-0002-3433-0265, University of Oxford) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 10-10 |
| Publication date | 2015-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Life Sciences Society and Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2195-7819 • E-ISSN: 2195-7819 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1186/s40504-015-0028-9 |
| PMID | 26412243 |
| OpenAlex | W2115501915 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 27 |
Innovations in information technologies have facilitated the development of new styles of research networks and forms of governance. This is evident in genomics where increasingly, research is carried out by large, interdisciplinary consortia focussing on a specific research endeavour. The UK10K project is an example of a human genomics consortium funded to provide insights into the genomics of rare conditions, and establish a community resource from generated sequence data. To achieve its objectives according to the agreed timetable, the UK10K project established an internal governance system to expedite the research and to deal with the complex issues that arose. The project's governance structure exemplifies a new form of network governance called 'pop-up' governance. 'Pop-up' because: it was put together quickly, existed for a specific period, was designed for a specific purpose, and was dismantled easily on project completion. In this paper, we use UK10K to describe how 'pop-up' governance works on the ground and how relational, hierarchical and contractual governance mechanisms are used in this new form of network governance
Business · Corporate governance · Information governance · Information system · Knowledge management · Political science · Project governance · Sociology · Computer Science · Ethics in Clinical Research · Law · Management Information Systems
The social psychology of collective action
Debating Governance
Data Sharing by Scientists
Decentring Regulation
Helping Individuals or Group Members? The Role of Individual and Collective Identification in Aids Volunteerism
Teams in Organizations
Relocation, realignment and standardisation
What Benefits the Group Can Also Benefit the Individual
The Dysfunctions of Markets, Hierarchies and Networks in the Meta-governance of Partnership
Motivation gains in performance groups
The Multisectoral Trilemma of Network Management
Modes of Network Governance
Governance’ as a bridge between disciplines
Knowledge of partner's ability as a moderator of group motivation gains
Politicized collective identity
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,33 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2022 (6) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |