Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Political equality, coalition formation, and economic performance in autocracies

Bibliographic Data

ID8252335
AuthorsYang Yao (0000-0002-7240-2688)
Year2021
Volume1
Issue1
Pages72-83
Publication date2021-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueChina Economic Quarterly International (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2666-9331 • E-ISSN: 2666-9331
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.ceqi.2020.11.001
OpenAlexW3131555220
LanguageEN
References cited14

Autocracies have diverse records of economic growth. This paper provides a theory of endogenous coalition formation to explain economic performance in autocracy. The nature of the ruling coalition that the autocrat relies on to rule the society and extract rents affects the degree of inclusiveness of the autocracy's political and economic institutions that ultimately determines economic performance. A stable ruling coalition has to be invasion-proof --- i.e., being able to resist invasion from outside --- and coalition-proof --- i.e., being able to prevent split from inside. In a political environment where side payments are allowed to buy political support, a ruling coalition is coalition-proof if and only if it satisfies Condition E, i.e., every pair of its member groups holds similar levels of political power relative to the power of any third group (including the autocrat). When more pairs of groups satisfy Condition E in a society, the ultimate ruling coalition becomes more inclusive and societal output is increased

Autocracy · Democracy · Economic rent · Economic system · Economics · Law and economics · Market economy · Physics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Corruption and Economic Development · Culture, Economy, and Development Studies · Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth · Law

  • Investment without democracy

    Open Access•Scott Gehlbach, Philip Keefer•Journal of Comparative Economics•2011

  • The Control of Politicians in Divided Societies

    Gerard Padró I Miquel•The Review of Economic Studies•2007

  • Coalition-Proof Nash Equilibria I. Concepts

    Open Access•B Douglas Bernheim, Bezalel Peleg et al.•Journal of Economic Theory•1987

  • Inequality in Landownership, the Emergence of Human-Capital Promoting Institutions, and the Great Divergence

    Oded Galor, Omer Moav et al.•The Review of Economic Studies•2009

  • Unequal Societies

    Roland Bénabou•American Economic Review•2000

  • Constitutions and Commitment

    Open Access•Douglass C North, Barry R Weingast•The Journal of Economic History•1989

  • Private Investment and the Institutionalization of Collective Action in Autocracies

    Scott Gehlbach, Philip Keefer•The Journal of Politics•2012

  • Power Sharing and Leadership Dynamics in Authoritarian Regimes

    Open Access•Milan W Svolik•American Journal of Political…•2009

  • Distributive Politics and Economic Growth

    Alberto Alesina, D Rodrik•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•1994

  • Do Institutions Cause Growth

    Open Access•Edward L Glaeser, Rafael La Porta et al.•Journal of Economic Growth•2004

  • Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development

    Open Access•Mancur Olson•American Political Science Review•1993

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae