Jaw‐muscle force and excursion scale with negative allometry in platyrrhine primates

Bibliographic Data

ID8318673
AuthorsA B Taylor (0000-0001-6647-5488, DPT Program Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Duke University School of Medicine Durham NC 27708, corresponding author), Tian Yuan (0000-0002-8570-1484, Department of Evolutionary Anthropology Duke University Durham NC 27710), Yuan Tian (0000-0002-0051-8788, Duke University), Callum F Ro (0000-0001-7764-761X, Organismal Biology and Anatomy University of Chicago Chicago IL 60637), Callum F Ross, Christopher J Vinyard (0000-0002-7355-5192, Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology NEOMED Rootstown OH 44272)
Year2015
Volume158
Issue2
Pages242-256
Publication date2015-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-9483 • E-ISSN: 1096-8644
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/ajpa.22782
PMID26175006
OpenAlexW2117203748
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited76

Objectives Platyrrhines span two orders of magnitude in body size and are characterized by diverse feeding behaviors and diets. While size plays an important role in primate feeding behavior and masticatory apparatus morphology, we know little about size‐correlated changes in the force‐generating (physiologic cross‐sectional area; PCSA) and excursion/stretch (fiber length; L f ) capabilities of the jaw‐closing muscles in platyrrhines. Methods We examined scaling relationships of the superficial masseter and temporalis muscles in 21 platyrrhine species. Previous work suggests that larger platyrrhines are at a mechanical disadvantage for generating bite forces compared with smaller platyrrhines. We hypothesize that scaling of jaw‐muscle fiber architecture counters this size‐correlated decrease in mechanical advantage. Thus, we predicted that jaw‐muscle PCSAs and muscle weights scale with positive allometry while L f s scale with negative allometry, relative to load‐arm estimates for incisor/molar biting and chewing. Results Jaw‐muscle PCSAs and L f s appear to scale with negative allometry relative to load‐arm estimates and body size. Negative allometry of jaw‐muscle weights partially accounts for the size‐correlated decreases in PCSA and L f . Estimates of bite force also scale with negative allometry. Conclusion Large‐bodied platyrrhines (e.g., Alouatta ) are at a relative disadvantage for generating jaw‐muscle and bite force as well as jaw‐muscle stretch, compared with smaller species (e.g., Callithrix ). The net effect is that larger platyrrhines likely produce relatively smaller maximal bite forces compared with smaller taxa. Relative to small‐ and intermediate‐sized platyrrhines, large‐bodied platyrrhines feed on some of the least mechanically challenging foods, consistent with the size‐correlated decrease in relative muscle and bite forces across the clade. Am J Phys Anthropol, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Am J Phys Anthropol 158:242–256, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc

Allometry · Biology · Bite force quotient · Biting · Primate · Amphibian and Reptile Biology · Anatomy · Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior · Ecology · Primate Behavior and Ecology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub