Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Farmer Attitudes Toward Production of Perennial Energy Grasses in East Central Illinois

Implications for Community-Based Decision Making

Bibliographic Data

ID8375828
AuthorsMiriam A Cope (University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign), Sara Mclafferty, L Mclafferty (0000-0001-8413-7562, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign), Bruce L Rhoads (0000-0003-2112-745X, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign)
Year2011
Volume101
Issue4
Pages852-862
Publication date2011-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAnnals of the Association of American Geographers (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0004-5608 • E-ISSN: 1467-8306
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00045608.2011.575320
OpenAlexW1977728238
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited42

Throughout the Midwestern United States, land owners and managers, mainly farmers, are increasingly considering the possibility of transforming industrial agricultural landscapes that currently are used almost strictly for food production to landscapes that include renewable energy production. Because most land in this region is privately owned and independently farmed, transformation of the landscape will be the product of myriad decisions by individual farmers. Little is known about the geographic, environmental, and sociocultural forces that influence farmers’ decisions. We use survey methods and a geographic information system (GIS)-aided focus group to elicit farmers’ perspectives on growing perennial energy grasses such as switchgrass in central Illinois. Approximately one third of surveyed farmers are willing to plant energy grasses if a local market exists. Farmers’ planting decisions are bound up with their understandings of land suitability for planting at the farmstead and regional scales. Through a GIS-aided focus group, participants defined lands suitable for energy grass production—marginal lands—not purely in environmental terms but in relation to existing cropping patterns, farming operations, land parcel characteristics, and the social relations of farming. We find that farmers perceive an array of economic, social, and geographic barriers to energy grass cultivation and that these perspectives deserve attention in renewable energy policy debates

Agricultural economics · Agroforestry · Agronomy · Biology · Economics · Geography · Perennial plant · Production (economics) · Bioenergy crop production and management · Environmental Science · Forest Management and Policy · Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy

  • Symbolic meanings, landowner support, and dedicated bioenergy crops in the rural northeastern United States

    Open Access•Weston M Eaton, Morey Burnham et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2019

  • Imprinted in the mind and on the land

    Open Access•Amariah Fischer, Matthew R Sanderson•International Journal of…•2026

  • Water, culture, and adaptation in the High Plains-Ogallala Aquifer region

    Open Access•Amariah Fischer, Matthew R Sanderson et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2022

  • Limited adoption of short rotation coppice

    Open Access•Charles R Warren, Rob J F Burton et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2016

  • The politics of imaginaries and bioenergy sub-niches in the emerging Northeast U.S. bioenergy economy

    Open Access•Morey Burnham, Weston Eaton et al.•Geoforum•2017

  • Perceptions about switchgrass and land allocation decisions

    Open Access•Pralhad Burli, Pankaj Lal et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Landowner willingness to supply marginal land for bioenergy production

    Open Access•Theodoros Skevas, Noel J Hayden et al.•Land Use Policy•2016

  • Changing decisions in a changing landscape

    Open Access•Monica A Dorning, Jordan W Smith et al.•Land Use Policy•2015

  • Nature

    N Castree•Nature•2005

  • Adaptive Capacity and Community-Based Natural Resource Management

    Open Access•Derek Armitage•Environmental Management•2005

  • A Typology of Collaboration Efforts in Environmental Management

    Open Access•Richard D Margerum•Environmental Management•2008

  • Factors Influencing Farmer Participation in the Environmentally Sensitive Areas Scheme

    Open Access•Geoff A Wilson•Journal of Environmental Management•1997

  • Key Principles of Community-Based Natural Resource Management

    Open Access•James S Gruber•Environmental Management•2010

  • Stakeholder participation for environmental management

    Open Access•Mark S Reed•Biological Conservation•2008

  • From productivism to post‐productivism … and back again? Exploring the (un)changed natural and mental landscapes of European agriculture

    Open Access•Geoff A Wilson•Transactions of the Institute of…•2001

  • Divergent perspectives on water resource sustainability in a public–policy–science context

    Open Access•Kirsten L Larson, D D White et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2009

  • Constructing the object

    Open Access•Keith Halfacree•International Journal of…•2001

  • A New Vanguard for the Environment

    Edward P Weber•Society & Natural Resources•2000

  • Community-Based Natural Resource Management

    Susan Lurie, Michael Hibbard•Society & Natural Resources•2008

  • Values and Ethical Beliefs Regarding Agricultural Drainage in Central Illinois, USA

    Michael A Urban•Society & Natural Resources•2005

  • Stakeholder Analysis and Social Network Analysis in Natural Resource Management

    C Prell, Klaus Hubacek et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2009

  • How to build multifunctional agricultural landscapes in the U.S. Corn Belt

    Open Access•Ryan C Atwell, Lisa A Schulte et al.•Land Use Policy•2010

  • Marginalization, Facilitation, and the Production of Unequal Risk

    Open Access•Timothy W Collins•Antipode•2010

  • Collaborative Water Resource Decision Support

    Timothy Nyerges, Paul Jankowski et al.•Annals of the Association of…•2006

  • New Geographies of Energy

    K S Zimmerer•Annals of the Association of…•2011

  • Beyond Cooptation or Resistance

    Sarah Elwood•Annals of the Association of…•2006

  • What Do We Know and Need to Know about the Environmental Outcomes of Collaborative Management

    Open Access•Tomas M Koontz, Craig W Thomas•Public Administration Review•2006

  • Enchantment and Disenchantment

    Open Access•Arun Agrawal, Clark C Gibson•World Development•1999

  • Feminist Visualization

    Mei-Po Kwan•Annals of the Association of…•2002

  • Thinking Outside the Box

    Open Access•Sarah Elwood•Geography Compass•2010

  • Images of Success

    Open Access•Gerry Walter•Rural Sociology•1997

  • Landscapes

    Open Access•Thomas Greider, Lorraine Garkovich•Rural Sociology•1994

  • Participatory Partnerships

    Open Access•Bruce Mitchell•Social Indicators Research•2005

Unique citing works8
Citations per year0,73
Citation span2015 - 2026 (12)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae