Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Accuracy–Coherence Trade-Off in Cognition

Bibliographic Data

ID8397350
AuthorsDavid Thorstad (0000-0003-1985-8931, Vanderbilt University, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume75
Issue3
Pages695-715
Publication date2024-09-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-0882 • E-ISSN: 1464-3537
PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1086/716518
OpenAlexW3186705471
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited42

I argue that bounded agents face a systematic accuracy-coherence tradeoff in cognition. Agents must choose whether to structure their cognition in ways likely to promote coherence or accuracy. I illustrate the accuracy-coherence tradeoff by showing how it arises out of at least two component tradeoffs: a coherence-complexity tradeoff between coherence and cognitive complexity, and a coherence-variety tradeoff between coherence and strategic variety. These tradeoffs give rise to an accuracy-coherence tradeoff because privileging coherence over complexity or strategic variety often leads to a corresponding reduction in accuracy. I conclude with a discussion of two normative consequences for the study of bounded rationality: the importance of procedural rationality and the role of coherence in theories of bounded rationality

Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy · Download · Epistemology · Philosophy of science · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Free Will and Agency · Mathematics · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science

  • Structural Rationality and the Property of Coherence

    Open Access•Marc-Kevin Daoust, Marc‐Kevin Daoust•Pacific philosophical quarterly•2023

  • Imperfection, Accuracy, and Structural Rationality

    Open Access•Marc-Kevin Daoust•Erkenntnis•2024

  • Tickles, iteration, and habits

    Open Access•Kenny Easwaran, Benjamin A Levinstein et al.•Theory and Decision•2026

  • The comparison problem for approximating epistemic ideals

    Open Access•Marc-Kevin Daoust•Ratio•2023

  • Reply to commentators

    Open Access•David Thorstad•Philosophical Studies•2025

  • The Zetetic Turn and the Procedural Turn

    David Thorstad, Journal Of Philosophy Inc•The Journal of Philosophy•2025

  • Will AI avoid exploitation? Artificial general intelligence and expected utility theory

    Open Access•Adam Bales•Philosophical Studies•2025

  • Why bounded rationality (in epistemology)

    Open Access•David Thorstad•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2023

  • Cognitive bias in large language models

    David Thorstad•The British Journal for the…•2026

  • All Frames Are Not Created Equal

    Open Access•Irwin P Levin, Sandra L Schneider et al.•Organizational Behavior and Human…•1998

  • Do Defaults Save Lives?

    Open Access•E Johnson, Daniel Goldstein•Science•2003

  • Adaptive strategy selection in decision making.

    John W Payne, James R Bettman et al.•Journal of Experimental…•1988

  • Probabilistic mental models

    Gerd Gigerenzer, Ulrich Hoffrage et al.•Psychological Review•1991

  • Toward a Rational and Mechanistic Account of Mental Effort

    Amitai Shenhav, Sebastian Musslick et al.•Annual Review of Neuroscience•2017

  • Reasoning the fast and frugal way

    Gerd Gigerenzer, Daniel G Goldstein•Psychological Review•1996

  • Why Be Rational?

    Niko Kolodny•Mind•2005

  • Effort and Accuracy in Choice

    Open Access•E Johnson, Eric J Johnson et al.•Management Science•1985

  • Homo Heuristicus

    Open Access•Gerd Gigerenzer, Henry Brighton•Topics in Cognitive Science•2009

  • Intransitivity of preferences.

    Amos Tversky•Psychological Review•1969

  • Rationality Through Reasoning

    Open Access•Ernest Sosa, John Broome•Rationality Through Reasoning•2013

  • Reasoning with heuristics

    Open Access•Brett Karlan•Ratio•2021

  • Making space for the normativity of coherence

    Open Access•Alex Worsnip•Noûs•2022

  • Predicting elections from the most important issue

    Open Access•Andreas Graefe, J Scott Armstrong•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2010

  • Blame It on the Norm

    Open Access•Andrea Polonioli•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•2014

  • Coherence as an ideal of rationality

    Open Access•Lyle Zynda•Synthese•1996

  • Axiomatic rationality and ecological rationality

    Open Access•Gerd Gigerenzer•Synthese•2021

  • Measuring the overall incoherence of credence functions

    Open Access•Julia Staffel•Synthese•2015

  • Bayes, Bounds, and Rational Analysis

    Open Access•Thomas F Icard, Thomas Icard•Philosophy of Science•2018

  • Graded Incoherence for Accuracy-Firsters

    Open Access•Glauber De Bona, Julia Staffel•Philosophy of Science•2017

  • Rationality Disputes - Psychology and Epistemology

    Open Access•Patrick Rysiew•Philosophy Compass•2008

  • Linear models in decision making

    Robyn M Dawes, Bernard Corrigan et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1974

Citations per year3
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae