Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Cognitive bias in large language models

A vindicatory approach

Bibliographic Data

ID8396801
AuthorsDavid Thorstad (0000-0003-1985-8931, corresponding author)
Year2026
Publication date2026-03-13
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-0882 • E-ISSN: 1464-3537
PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1086/741336
OpenAlexW7135185027
LanguageEN
References cited71

Cognition · Cognitive bias · Language Understanding · Semantics (computer science · Language and cultural evolution · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

  • Bayesian Rationality

    Mike Oaksford, Nick Chater•Bayesian rationality•2007

  • The Psychology of Proof

    Lance J Rips•The Psychology of Proof•1994

  • Nudge Versus Boost

    Open Access•Till Grüne-Yanoff, Ralph Hertwig•Minds and Machines•2016

  • Extensional versus intuitive reasoning

    Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman•Psychological Review•1983

  • On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning

    Open Access•Jonathan St B T Evans, Julie Linda Barston et al.•Memory & Cognition•1983

  • Measures of Anchoring in Estimation Tasks

    Open Access•Karen E Jacowitz, Daniel Kahneman•Personality and Social Psychology…•1995

  • The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

    Open Access•Nicholas Epley, Thomas Gilovich•Psychological Science•2006

  • Nudging and Boosting

    Open Access•Ralph Hertwig, Till Grüne-Yanoff•Perspectives on Psychological…•2017

  • Putting Adjustment Back in the Anchoring and Adjustment Heuristic

    Open Access•Nicholas Epley, Thomas Gilovich•Psychological Science•2001

  • A literature review of the anchoring effect

    Open Access•A Furnham, Hua Chu Boo•The Journal of Socio-Economics•2011

  • A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection.

    Mike Oaksford, Nick Chater•Psychological Review•1994

  • Individual differences in reasoning

    Open Access•Keith E Stanovich, Richard F West•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2000

  • Effort and Accuracy in Choice

    Open Access•E Johnson, Eric J Johnson et al.•Management Science•1985

  • On narrow norms and vague heuristics

    Gerd Gigerenzer•Psychological Review•1996

  • Climbing towards NLU

    Open Access•Emily M Bender, Alexander Koller•Proceedings of the 58th Annual…•2020

  • Bayesian Fundamentalism or Enlightenment? On the explanatory status and theoretical contributions of Bayesian models of cognition

    Open Access•Matt Jones, Bradley C Love•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2011

  • The hot hand in basketball

    Open Access•Thomas Gilovich, Robert P Vallone et al.•Cognitive Psychology•1985

  • A Mathematical Theory of Communication

    Claude E Shannon•Bell System Technical Journal•1948

  • Maps of Bounded Rationality

    Daniel Kahneman•American Economic Review•2003

  • Is it time for robot rights? Moral status in artificial entities

    Open Access•Vincent C Müller•Ethics and Information Technology•2021

  • The (Dis)unity of psychological (social) bias

    Genevieve Marie Johnson, Gabbrielle M Johnson•Philosophical Psychology•2024

  • Are “implicit” attitudes unconscious

    Open Access•Bertram Gawronski, Wilhelm Hofmann et al.•Consciousness and Cognition•2006

  • On the moral status of social robots

    Open Access•Kęstutis Mosakas•AI & Society•2021

  • The Probabilistic Turn in Semantics and Pragmatics

    Katrin Erk•Annual Review of Linguistics•2021

  • The Wason Task(s) and the Paradox of Confirmation

    Open Access•Branden Fitelson, James Hawthorne•Philosophical Perspectives•2010

  • The Right to Explanation

    Open Access•Kate Vredenburgh•Journal of Political Philosophy•2021

  • Formal versus Bounded Norms in the Psychology of Rationality

    Open Access•Thomas Sturm•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•2019

  • Algorithmic bias

    Open Access•Genevieve Marie Johnson•Synthese•2021

  • Transparency in Complex Computational Systems

    Open Access•Kathleen A Creel, Kathleen Creel•Philosophy of Science•2020

  • Bias, machine learning, and conceptual engineering

    Open Access•Rachel Etta Rudolph, Elay Shech et al.•Philosophical Studies•2025

  • Will intelligent machines become moral patients

    Open Access•Parisa Moosavi•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2023

  • Bias, norms, introspection, and the bias blind spot1

    Open Access•Thomas Kelly•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2023

  • Belief, Credence, and Pragmatic Encroachment 1

    Open Access•Jacob Ross, Mark Schroeder•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2012

  • Rational Polarization

    Kevin Dorst•The Philosophical Review•2023

  • The Accuracy–Coherence Trade-Off in Cognition

    David Thorstad•The British Journal for the…•2024

  • Maximizing versus satisficing

    Barry Schwartz, Andrew Ward et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2002

  • Reasoning about a Rule

    Open Access•P C Wason•Quarterly Journal of Experimental…•1968

  • Availability

    Open Access•Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman•Cognitive Psychology•1973

  • Bayesian just-so stories in psychology and neuroscience

    Jean S Bowers, Jeffrey S Bowers et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2012

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae