Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Bayesians Too Should Follow Wason

A Comprehensive Accuracy-Based Analysis of the Selection Task

Bibliographic Data

ID8397883
AuthorsFilippo Vindrola (5T Torino (Italy), corresponding author), Vincenzo Crupi (0000-0003-3545-6289, 5T Torino (Italy))
Year2024
Volume75
Issue2
Pages347-373
Publication date2024-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-0882 • E-ISSN: 1464-3537
PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1086/716170
OpenAlexW3181947450
LanguageEN
References cited46

Epistemology · Management · Philosophy of science · Selection (genetic algorithm · Task (project management · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

  • A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection.

    Mike Oaksford, Nick Chater•Psychological Review•1994

  • Elicitation of Personal Probabilities and Expectations

    Leonard J Savage•Journal of the American…•1971

  • Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and Estimation

    Tilmann Gneiting, Adrian E Raftery•Journal of the American…•2007

  • On Information and Sufficiency

    Open Access•S Kullback, R A Leibler•The Annals of Mathematical…•1951

  • A Mathematical Theory of Communication

    Claude E Shannon•Bell System Technical Journal•1948

  • The Wason Task(s) and the Paradox of Confirmation

    Open Access•Branden Fitelson, James Hawthorne•Philosophical Perspectives•2010

  • Scoring in context

    Open Access•Igor Douven•Synthese•2020

  • State of the field

    Open Access•Vincenzo Crupi, Katya Tentori•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2014

  • A Nonpragmatic Vindication of Probabilism

    Open Access•James M Joyce•Philosophy of Science•1998

  • Bayesian Measures of Confirmation from Scoring Rules

    Open Access•S J van Enk•Philosophy of Science•2014

  • An Objective Justification of Bayesianism I

    Open Access•Hannes Leitgeb, Richard Pettigrew•Philosophy of Science•2010

  • Epistemic Utility Theory and the Aim of Belief

    Open Access•James Revell Carr•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2017

  • What Accuracy Could Not Be

    Open Access•Graham Oddie•The British Journal for the…•2019

  • Bayesian Confirmation

    Peter Brössel, Franz Huber•The British Journal for the…•2015

  • Hempel's Raven Paradox

    Peter B M Vranas•The British Journal for the…•2004

  • Information and Inaccuracy

    William Roche, Tomoji Shogenji•The British Journal for the…•2018

  • Reasoning about a Rule

    Open Access•P C Wason•Quarterly Journal of Experimental…•1968

  • Epistemic Utility and Norms for Credences

    Open Access•Richard Pettigrew•Philosophy Compass•2013

  • On selecting evidence to test hypotheses

    Marco Ragni, Ilir Kola et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2018

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae