Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Models Don’t Decompose That Way

A Holistic View of Idealized Models

Bibliographic Data

ID8399187
AuthorsCollin Rice (0000-0002-4632-345X, Bryn Mawr College, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume70
Issue1
Pages179-208
Publication date2019-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-0882 • E-ISSN: 1464-3537
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/bjps/axx045
OpenAlexW2752066619
LanguageEN
Citations received33
References cited42

Many (if not most) accounts of scientific modelling assume that models can be decomposed into the contributions made by their accurate and inaccurate parts. These accounts then argue that the inaccurate parts of the model can be justified by distorting only what is irrelevant. In this article, I argue that this decompositional strategy requires three assumptions that are not typically met by our best scientific models. In response, I propose an alternative view in which idealized models are characterized as holistically distorted representations that are justified by allowing for the application of various (mathematical) modelling techniques. 1 Introduction2 The Decompositional Strategy 2.1 Mechanistic modelling and decomposition 2.2 Accounts of explanation that require decomposition 2.3 Accounts of idealization that require decomposition 2.4 Robustness analysis and decomposition 2.5 Scientific realism and decomposition 2.6 Three assumptions of the decompositional strategy3 Against the Decompositional Strategy 3.1 Many scientific models don’t decompose that way 3.2 Many idealizations distort difference-making features4 An Alternative Approach: The Holistic Distortion View of Idealized Models5 Conclusion

Decomposition · Epistemology · Flexibility (engineering) · Idealization · Mathematical economics · Philosophy of science · Robustness (evolution) · Scientific modelling · Statistics · Complex Systems and Decision Making · Computer Science · Gene Regulatory Network Analysis · Mathematics · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science

  • Extending Similarity-Based Epistemology of Modality with Models

    Open Access•Ylwa Sjölin Wirling•Ergo an Open Access Journal of…•2022

  • Bilimsel İdealizasyonlar

    Open Access•A Dinçer ÇEVİK•Mediterranean Journal of Humanities•2022

  • The unfeasibility of onto-representationalism

    Open Access•Mariano Martín-Villuendas•THEORIA An International Journal…•2024

  • Rules to Infinity

    Open Access•Mark Povich•Rules to Infinity•2025

  • On Leszek Nowak’s Conception of the Unity of Science

    Open Access•Mateusz Wajzer•Foundations of Science•2022

  • Generative Models

    Open Access•Sim-Hui Tee•Erkenntnis•2023

  • The Truth About Better Understanding

    Open Access•L Ro•Erkenntnis•2023

  • A Defense of Truth as a Necessary Condition on Scientific Explanation

    Open Access•Christopher Pincock•Erkenntnis•2023

  • Łukasz Hardt, Economics Without Laws

    Open Access•D Wade Hands•OEconomia•2019

  • Economic Methodology in the Twenty-First Century (So Far)

    D Wade Hands•Revue de philosophie économique•2020

  • Eliminating Idealizations with Soundness Analysis

    Open Access•Raja Panjwani, Aki Lehtinen•Erkenntnis•2026

  • Defending De-idealization in Economic Modeling

    Open Access•Edoardo Peruzzi, Gustavo Cevolani•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•2022

  • Understanding realism

    Open Access•Collin Rice•Synthese•2021

  • Scientific understanding and felicitous legitimate falsehoods

    Open Access•Insa Lawler•Synthese•2021

  • Factive inferentialism and the puzzle of model-based explanation

    Open Access•Philippe Verreault-Julien•Synthese•2021

  • Truth, understanding, and normativity in scientific models

    Open Access•Lorenzo Spagnesi•Synthese•2025

  • Cognitive dynamical models as minimal models

    Open Access•Travis Holmes•Synthese•2021

  • Modeling multiscale patterns

    Open Access•Collin Rice•Synthese•2022

  • Gradual de-idealisation and progress in political science

    Open Access•Mateusz Wajzer•Synthese•2024

  • Design principles as minimal models

    Open Access•Wei Fang•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2024

  • Idealisation, genetic explanations and political behaviours

    Open Access•Mateusz Wajzer•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2021

  • Scaling procedures in climate science

    Open Access•Alexandra Watkins•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2023

  • Describing model relations

    Open Access•Melissa Vergara-Fernández, Conrad Heilmann et al.•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2023

  • Empirical techniques and the accuracy of scientific representations

    Open Access•Dana Matthiessen•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2022

  • Holistic idealization

    Open Access•Natalia Carrillo, Tarja Knuuttila•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2022

  • Reckoning with Continuum Idealizations

    Open Access•Travis Holmes•Philosophy of Science•2022

  • Model Evaluation

    Open Access•Wendy S Parker•Philosophy of Science•2020

  • Deidealization

    Open Access•Tarja Knuuttila, Michael S Morgan et al.•Philosophy of Science•2019

  • Do Machine Learning Models Represent Their Targets

    Open Access•Emily Sullivan•Philosophy of Science•2024

  • On the Role of Erotetic Constraints in Noncausal Explanations

    Open Access•Daniel Kostić•Philosophy of Science•2024

  • Multi-Model Reasoning in Economics

    Open Access•Jennifer S Jhun•Philosophy of Science•2023

  • Understanding Particle Interactions

    Karla Weingarten•The British Journal for the…•2025

  • Concrete Scale Models, Essential Idealization, and Causal Explanation

    Open Access•Christopher Pincock•The British Journal for the…•2022

  • Simulation and Similarity

    Michael Weisberg•Simulation and similarity•2013

  • How the Laws of Physics Lie

    Nancy Cartwright•How the laws of physics lie•1983

  • Making Things Happen

    James Woodward•Making Things Happen•2004

  • The Devil in the Details

    Robert W Batterman•The Devil in the Details•2001

  • Depth

    Michael Strevens•Depth•2011

  • Explaining the Brain

    Carl F Craver•Explaining the brain•2007

  • A Novel Defense of Scientific Realism

    Jarrett Leplin•A novel defense of scientific…•1997

  • Idealization and the Aims of Science

    Angela Potochnik•Idealization and the Aims of…•2017

  • Causation in biology

    Open Access•James Woodward•Biology & Philosophy•2010

  • Three Kinds of Idealization

    Michael Weisberg, Inc Journal of Philosophy•The Journal of Philosophy•2007

  • Modeling mechanisms

    Open Access•Stuart Glennan•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2005

  • When mechanistic models explain

    Open Access•Carl F Craver•Synthese•2006

  • Idealized models, holistic distortions, and universality

    Open Access•Collin Rice•Synthese•2018

  • How dimensional analysis can explain

    Open Access•Mark Pexton•Synthese•2014

  • Models and fiction

    Open Access•Roman Frigg•Synthese•2010

  • How scientific models can explain

    Open Access•Alisa Bokulich•Synthese•2011

  • Modeling reality

    Open Access•Christopher Pincock•Synthese•2011

  • The Trials of Life

    Open Access•Denis M Walsh, Tim Lewens et al.•Philosophy of Science•2002

  • What Elements of Successful Scientific Theories Are the Correct Targets for “Selective” Scientific Realism

    Open Access•Dean Peters•Philosophy of Science•2014

  • No Refuge for Realism

    Open Access•P Kyle Stanford•Philosophy of Science•2003

  • The Explanatory Force of Dynamical and Mathematical Models in Neuroscience

    Open Access•David M Kaplan, Carl F Craver•Philosophy of Science•2011

  • Reassessing Woodward’s Account of Explanation

    Open Access•Juha Saatsi, Mark Pexton•Philosophy of Science•2013

  • The Idealization of Causation in Mechanistic Explanation

    Open Access•Alan C Love, Marco J Nathan•Philosophy of Science•2015

  • Distinguishing Explanatory from Nonexplanatory Fictions

    Open Access•Alisa Bokulich•Philosophy of Science•2012

  • Robustness Analysis

    Open Access•Michael Weisberg•Philosophy of Science•2006

  • Population Genetics and Population Thinking

    Open Access•Margaret Morrison•Philosophy of Science•2004

  • Thinking about Mechanisms

    Open Access•Peter Machamer, Lindley Darden et al.•Philosophy of Science•2000

  • Physical Models and Biological Contexts

    Open Access•Margaret Morrison•Philosophy of Science•1997

  • Minimal Model Explanations

    Open Access•Robert W Batterman, Collin Rice et al.•Philosophy of Science•2014

  • Economic Modelling as Robustness Analysis

    Jaakko Kuorikoski, Aki Lehtinen et al.•The British Journal for the…•2010

  • Autonomous-Statistical Explanations and Natural Selection

    André Ariew, Collin Rice et al.•The British Journal for the…•2015

  • On the Explanatory Role of Mathematics in Empirical Science

    Robert W Batterman•The British Journal for the…•2010

Unique citing works33
Citations per year4,71
Citation span2019 - 2026 (8)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 30

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae