Bias, Lotteries, and Affirmative Action in Science Funding Policy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8399412 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jamie Shaw (0000-0002-2812-860X, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Publication date | 2024-03-08 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-0882 • E-ISSN: 1464-3537 |
| Publisher | University of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1086/730218 |
| OpenAlex | W4392580193 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 78 |
Action (physics · Actuarial science · Affirmative action · Econometrics · Economics · Physics · Political science · Positive economics · Public economics · Science policy · Diversity and Career in Medicine · Health and Medical Research Impacts · Law · Public Administration · scientometrics and bibliometrics research
How Professors Think
Science, Truth, and Democracy
Intersectional inequalities in science
Race, Ethnicity, and NIH Research Awards
Bias in peer review
The Diversity–Innovation Paradox in Science
Assessing Affirmative Action
The Matthew effect in science funding
Sex differences in research funding, productivity and impact
Gender differences in grant peer review
AI-assisted peer review
Criteria for assessing grant applications
Why Antibias Interventions (Need Not) Fail
The leaky pipeline in research grant peer review and funding decisions
Peer reviewer topic choice and its impact on interrater reliability
How blind is blind review
Peer Review, Innovation, and Predicting the Future of Science
How blind is blind review
Improving the peer-review process for grant applications
An Overview of Implicit Measures of Attitudes
How Gender and Race Stereotypes Impact the Advancement of Scholars in STEM
Peer Review or Lottery? A Critical Analysis of Two Different Forms of Decision-making Mechanisms for Allocation of Research Grants
Why citizen review might beat peer review at identifying pursuitworthy scientific research
Academic superstars
Mavericks and lotteries
The natural selection of conservative science
On the very idea of pursuitworthiness
Discrimination and Collaboration in Science
Conditions for intuitive expertise
Does Enclave Deliberation Polarize Opinions
Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science
Social Science for What? Battles over Public Funding for the "Other Sciences" at the National Science Foundation
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |