Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Matthew effect in science funding

Bibliographic Data

ID23328800
AuthorsT Bol (0000-0001-9509-8423, University of Amsterdam), M De Vaan (0000-0003-1971-7290, Management of Organizations Group, Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720), A Van De Rijt (0000-0002-4208-3452, Utrecht University)
Year2018
Volume115
Issue19
Pages4887-4890
Publication date2018-05-08
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0027-8424 • E-ISSN: 1091-6490
PublisherNational Academy of Sciences (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1073/pnas.1719557115
PMID29686094
OpenAlexW2802509651
LanguageEN
Citations received143
References cited33

Significance Why do scientists with similar backgrounds and abilities often end up achieving very different degrees of success? A classic explanation is that academic achievement exhibits a “Matthew effect”: Early successes increase future success chances. We analyze data from a large academic funding program that present a unique opportunity to quantify the Matthew effect and identify generative mechanisms. Our results show that winners just above the funding threshold accumulate more than twice as much funding during the subsequent eight years as nonwinners with near-identical review scores that fall just below the threshold. This effect is partly caused by nonwinners ceasing to compete for other funding opportunities, revealing a “participation” mechanism driving the Matthew effect.

Asset (computer security) · Asset allocation · Economics · Grant funding · Political science · Portfolio · Public funding · Computer Science · Finance · Public Administration · scientometrics and bibliometrics research

  • The role of non-parametric and parametric methods in benchmarking research performance

    Open Access•Anar Abdikadirova, Lyazzat SEMBIYEVA et al.•Journal of Infrastructure Policy…•2024

  • International Circulations and Inequalities in the Social Sciences

    Open Access•Pierre Benz, Johanna Gautier Morin et al.•Serendipities. Journal for the…•2024

  • Maneuvering through a Changing Funding Terrain

    Open Access•Alexander Kladakis, Kaare Aagaard et al.•Engaging Science Technology and…•2022

  • Achieving good science

    Open Access•J Pols, Amade M’charek et al.•Learning and Teaching•2024

  • Uma análise bibliométrica da recepção de Pierre Bourdieu na ciência política

    Open Access•Adriano Codato, Marcelo Bittencourt et al.•Educação e Pesquisa•2022

  • Research on cooperation mechanism of marine plastic waste management based on complex network evolutionary game

    Open Access•Xin Xu, Yingying Hou et al.•Marine Policy•2021

  • A theory of emergence

    Open Access•Nee, Sirui Wang et al.•Social Science Research•2023

  • Global citation inequality is on the rise

    Open Access•Mathias Wullum Nielsen, Jens Peter Andersen•Proceedings of the National…•2021

  • Rethinking Stardom

    Open Access•Ernest H O''Boyle, Ernest H O'Boyle et al.•Annual Review of Organizational…•2025

  • The Next Generation of Clinical-Psychological Science

    Open Access•Craig Rodriguez-Seijas, Juliette Mcclendon et al.•Clinical Psychological Science•2023

  • Skill, status and the Matthew effect

    Open Access•Mikael Bask•Journal of Computational Social…•2024

  • Introduction to the Special Issue

    Open Access•Philippe Saner, Luca Tratschin et al.•Swiss Journal of Sociology•2024

  • In the race for knowledge, is human capital the most essential element

    Open Access•Laura Sinay, Rodney William Carter et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2020

  • The Matthew effect in political science

    Open Access•P Lindenfors, Matthew Wilson et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2020

  • Shielding the few and perpetrating the pattern for the many

    Open Access•Giulio Marini, Viviana Meschitti•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2025

  • The innovation trade-off

    Open Access•Sean Kelty, Raiyan Abdul Baten et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2025

  • Critical reflections of postgraduate researchers on a collaborative interdisciplinary research project

    Open Access•Ben Purvi, Hannah Keding et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2023

  • Unequal fields

    Open Access•Monica Addison, Prince Osei-Wusu Adjei et al.•Social Sciences & Humanities Open•2026

  • Influence of academic inbreeding on the performance of hospital personnel

    Open Access•Zhijian Li, Z Y Li et al.•Frontiers in Education•2026

  • Social Development Paradox

    Open Access•Haibin Zhu•IEEE Transactions on Computational…•2022

  • Equilibrium Means Equity? An E-Cargo Perspective on the Golden Mean Principle

    Open Access•Qian Jiang, Dongning Liu et al.•IEEE Transactions on Computational…•2023

  • Quantile regression analysis of the heterogeneous association between digital cultural engagement and health literacy

    Open Access•Chenglin Du, Lanka Wu•Frontiers in Public Health•2026

  • Citation Metrics in Psychological Science

    Open Access•Nina Radošić, Ed Diener•Perspectives on Psychological…•2021

  • Reckoning With Our Crisis

    Open Access•Sarah R Schiavone, Simine Vazire•Perspectives on Psychological…•2023

  • Rythmes et agenda de la recherche

    Open Access•Béatrice Fleury, Jacques Walter•Questions de communication•2022

  • Recherche et dogmatisme

    Open Access•Enka Blanchard, Zacharie Boubli•Questions de communication•2022

  • The Role of Early-Career University Prestige Stratification on the Future Academic Performance of Scholars

    Open Access•Mario González-Sauri, Giulia Rossello•Research in Higher Education•2023

  • The “Scientific Elite” as a Problem and Concept

    Open Access•Yurij L Katchanov•Sociological Journal•2026

  • Spatio-temporal coupling and interactive effects of environmental education and water-saving society construction

    Open Access•Yan Shi, Chaoyang Yue et al.•Water Policy•2026

  • On the Association between Grants and Scholarly Achievement among the World’s Most Eminent Psychologists

    Open Access•Scott O Lilienfeld, Shauna M Bowe et al.•Current Psychology•2023

  • Scientific Truth in a Post-Truth Era

    Open Access•Cornel Hagiopol, Polliana M Leru•Science & Education•2025

  • Early career researchers’ perceptions of the benefits and challenges of sharing research with academic and non-academic end-users

    Margaret Kristin Merga, Sally Mason•Higher Education Research &…•2021

  • Grant counts, funding amount, and academic productivity

    Open Access•Xiaojie Fan, Hanyu Qin et al.•Studies in Higher Education•2026

  • Developing as a post-PhD researcher

    Open Access•Larissa Yousoubova, Lynn Mcalpine•Journal for the Study of…•2022

  • Variability in and mixtures among residential vacancies at granular levels

    Open Access•Yongting Pan, Wang Zeng et al.•Computers Environment and Urban…•2021

  • Rank Has Its Privileges

    Open Access•Gokce Basbug, Ayn Cavicchi et al.•Journal of Business Ethics•2023

  • Rethinking Knowledge Production in University Research Teams

    Open Access•Zhe Cheng, Xuan Liu et al.•European Journal of Education•2026

  • Dynamic Analysis of Research Efficiency

    Open Access•Jifang Yuan, Yufan Zhou et al.•European Journal of Education•2026

  • The university research assessment dilemma

    Open Access•Paolo Fantozzi, Valerio Ficcadenti et al.•Scientometrics•2025

  • Scientific elites versus other scientists

    Open Access•Yun Liu, Mengya Zhang et al.•Scientometrics•2022

  • The Matthew effect impacts science and academic publishing by preferentially amplifying citations, metrics and status

    Open Access•Jaime A Teixeira Da Silva•Scientometrics•2021

  • Connections matter

    Open Access•Matteo Cinelli, Giovanna Ferraro et al.•Scientometrics•2022

  • Forecasting the future of library and information science and its sub-fields

    Open Access•Zehra Taşkın•Scientometrics•2021

  • Do grant proposal texts matter for funding decisions? A field experiment

    Open Access•M Simsek, M De Vaan et al.•Scientometrics•2024

  • Sophis

    Open Access•Eugenio Petrovich, Selene Allevi et al.•Scientometrics•2026

  • An exploration of gender gap using advanced data science tools

    Open Access•Mengyu Yu, Mazie Krehbiel et al.•Scientometrics•2020

  • Early firm engagement, government research funding, and the privatization of public knowledge

    Open Access•Zhou Mo, Zhang Yujie et al.•Scientometrics•2022

  • Triangle of inequalities

    Open Access•Elvira González‐Salmón, Zaida Chinchilla‐Rodríguez•Scientometrics•2026

  • Do researchers from prestigious universities deserve advantages in research funding? Evidence from the National Natural Science Foundation of China

    Open Access•Shuwen Wang, Minglu Li et al.•Scientometrics•2025

  • The distribution of scientific project funds model based on adaptive similarity fitting and NSGA-II

    Open Access•Boze Li, Yandong He et al.•Scientometrics•2024

  • Understanding the sustainability of supply–demand in peer review system

    Open Access•Houqiang Yu, Yian Liang et al.•Scientometrics•2025

  • Research funding in Turkiye

    Open Access•Faruk Aydın, Zehra Taşkın•Scientometrics•2025

  • One capability, many outcomes

    Open Access•Liyun Hu, Zhaopeng Li et al.•Scientometrics•2026

  • Factors affecting the citations of papers in tribology journals

    Open Access•T Liskiewicz, Grzegorz Liśkiewicz et al.•Scientometrics•2021

  • Investigating collaborative and mobility networks

    Open Access•Zsolt Tibor Kosztyán, Beáta Fehérvölgyi et al.•Scientometrics•2021

  • The interplay of the size of the research system, ways of collaboration, level, and method of funding in determining bibliometric outputs

    Open Access•Tanel Hirv•Scientometrics•2022

  • The effect of structural holes on producing novel and disruptive research in physics

    Open Access•Yue Wang, Ning Li et al.•Scientometrics•2023

  • Encoding the citation life-cycle

    Open Access•Zhenyu Gou, Fan Meng et al.•Scientometrics•2022

  • Pasteur’s quadrant in AI

    Open Access•Xingyu Gao, Qiang Wu et al.•Scientometrics•2024

  • The evolution of scientific disciplines in applied sciences

    Open Access•Mario Coccia•Scientometrics•2020

  • Continued collaboration shortens the transition period of scientists who move to another institution

    Open Access•Liyin Zhang, Yuchen Qian et al.•Scientometrics•2023

  • A study of 25 years of publication outputs in the German academic profession

    Open Access•Christian Schneijderberg, Nicolai Götze et al.•Scientometrics•2022

  • Unsuccessful research funding applications

    Open Access•Olumide A Odeyemi, Yvonne Parry et al.•Scientometrics•2025

  • Assessing the impact of collaborative authorship in Business Economics in Latin America

    Open Access•Claudia González-Brambila, Renata Herrerías•Scientometrics•2024

  • The Annus Mirabilis paper

    Open Access•G Yair, Keith Goldstein•Scientometrics•2020

  • The Matthew effect in SDG-related architectural research

    Open Access•Hajar Sotudeh, Mahsa Amiri et al.•Scientometrics•2026

  • Predictors of applying for and winning an ERC Proof-of-Concept grant

    Open Access•Marco Seeber, Ilai Alon et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2022

  • How to assess the impact of fellowships on academic careers? Latent transition analyses for funding programmes of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation

    Open Access•Rüdiger Mutz, Hans‐dieter Daniel et al.•Quality & Quantity•2025

  • The leaky pipeline in research grant peer review and funding decisions

    Open Access•Sayaka Sato, Pascal M Gygax et al.•Higher Education•2021

  • Concentration or dispersal of research funding

    Open Access•Kaare Aagaard, Alexander Kladakis et al.•Quantitative Science Studies•2020

  • A new approach for estimating research impact

    Open Access•Gérard Chevalier, Christine Chomienne et al.•Quantitative Science Studies•2020

  • Auditing citation polarization during the early Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Taekho You, June Young Lee et al.•Quantitative Science Studies•2024

  • Matthew effects in science and the serial diffusion of ideas

    Open Access•Rudolf Farys, T Wolbring•Quantitative Science Studies•2021

  • Political hegemony, imitation isomorphism, and project familiarity

    Open Access•Yang Ding, Yi Bu•Quantitative Science Studies•2025

  • The effect of public funding on long-term relocation of experienced researchers

    Open Access•Marco Seeber, Mattia Cattaneo et al.•Quantitative Science Studies•2025

  • Gender gap among highly cited researchers, 2014–2021

    Open Access•Lokman I Meho•Quantitative Science Studies•2022

  • Concentration of Danish research funding on individual researchers and research topics

    Open Access•Emil Bargmann Madsen, Kaare Aagaard•Quantitative Science Studies•2020

  • Talent hat, cross-border mobility, and career development in China

    Open Access•Yurui Huang, Xuesen Cheng et al.•Quantitative Science Studies•2024

  • The use of informetric methods to study diversity in the scientific workforce

    Open Access•Nicolás Robinson‐García, Carmen Corona-Sobrino et al.•Quantitative Science Studies•2025

  • Predicting article quality scores with machine learning

    Open Access•Mike Thelwall, Kayvan Kousha et al.•Quantitative Science Studies•2023

  • Individual and gender inequality in computer science

    Open Access•Haiko Lietz, Mohsen Jadidi et al.•Quantitative Science Studies•2024

  • Does Cluster Hiring Enhance Faculty Research Output, Collaborations, and Impact? Results from a National Study of U.S. Research Universities

    Open Access•Michaela Curran, Quinn Bloom et al.•Minerva•2020

  • There Is Cumulative Status Bias and Status Entrenchment in NBA Awards

    Open Access•Thomas Biegert, Michael Kühhirt et al.•Sociological Science•2026

  • Status Ambiguity and Multiplicity in the Selection of NBA Awards

    Open Access•Peter Mcmahan, E Shor•Sociological Science•2024

  • The Changing Profile of Tenure-Track Faculty in Archaeology

    Open Access•Justin Cramb, Brandon T Ritchison et al.•Advances in Archaeological Practice•2022

  • Gender and innovation through an intersectional lens

    Open Access•Ethel L Mickey, Laurel Smith-Doerr•Sociology Compass•2022

  • Social stratification in science

    Open Access•E Bukodi, John H Goldthorpe et al.•European Societies•2024

  • Ablehnungen gehören halt zum Geschäft.“ Lernprozesse in wissenschaftlichen Drittmittelbiografien

    Open Access•Kathia Serrano Velarde, Kai Behrendt et al.•Berliner Journal für Soziologie•2022

  • The Effect of R&D Investment on Graduate Student Productivity

    Open Access•Alexandra Graddy‐Reed, Lauren Lanahan et al.•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•2018

  • Money, money, money… in the world of academia

    Open Access•Lina Mayer, L L MAYER•Possibility Studies & Society•2024

  • Subsidized Housing

    Open Access•K H Choi, Arabella Soave•Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue…•2025

  • From an Input to an Output

    Open Access•Maria Pietilä•Higher Education Policy•2024

  • The superstar effect on perceived performance in professional football

    Open Access•Yu Pan, Marco Henriques Pereira et al.•Journal of Economic Psychology•2024

  • Socio-emotional Skills and the Socioeconomic Achievement Gap

    Open Access•Rob J Gruijters, I J Raabe et al.•Sociology of Education•2024

  • The financial dimension of organizational stratification in European higher education

    Open Access•Krzysztof Czarnecki, Petra Sauer•International Journal of…•2024

  • Introduction to structural causal models in science studies

    Open Access•Thomas Klebel, Vincent Traag•Quantitative Science Studies•2026

  • Unpacking gender disparities in grant-seeking behavior at the University of Cambridge

    Open Access•Agata Czech, Noam Tal-Perry et al.•Quantitative Science Studies•2026

  • Mapping inequalities in the academic research ecosystem

    Open Access•Mads Schäfer Bak•Quantitative Science Studies•2026

  • Whistleblowers in an Academic Gift Culture - A Commentary on the Scandal in Academia

    Open Access•M J Heron, Pauline Helen Belford•ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society•2022

  • The Value of Insiders as Mentors

    Sebastian Hoenen, Christos Kolympiris•The Review of Economics and…•2020

  • Social Influence Bias

    Open Access•Lev Muchnik, Sinan Aral et al.•Science•2013

  • On a Class of Skew Distribution Functions

    Herbert A Simon•Biometrika•1955

  • Creative productivity

    Dean K Simonton•Psychological Review•1997

  • The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity

    Open Access•Brian A Jacob, Brian Jacob et al.•Journal of Public Economics•2011

  • Matthew

    Open Access•Pierre Azoulay, Toni Stuart et al.•Management Science•2014

  • Chance and Consensus in Peer Review

    Open Access•Cole, Stephen Cole et al.•Science•1981

  • Quantifying Long-Term Scientific Impact

    Open Access•Dashun Wang, Chaoming Song et al.•Science•2013

  • Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact

    Open Access•Roberta Sinatra, Dashun Wang et al.•Science•2016

  • Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data

    Aaron Clauset, Cosma Rohilla Shalizi et al.•SIAM Review•2009

  • A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes

    Open Access•Derek De Solla Price•Journal of the American Society…•1976

  • Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks

    Open Access•Albert-László Barabási, Richard Albert et al.•Science•1999

  • Regression Discontinuity Designs in Economics

    David S Lee, Thomas Lemieux•Journal of Economic Literature•2010

  • Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality

    T Diprete, Thomas A Diprete et al.•Annual Review of Sociology•2006

  • Aging as intracohort differentiation

    Open Access•Dale Dannefer•Sociological Forum•1987

  • Productivity Differences Among Scientists

    P D Allison, John Stewart et al.•American Sociological Review•1974

  • Cumulative Advantage and Inequality in Science

    P D Allison, J Scott Long et al.•American Sociological Review•1982

  • Scientific Productivity and the Reward Structure of Science

    Barbara F Reskin•American Sociological Review•1977

  • A Sociological (De)Construction of the Relationship between Status and Quality

    Freda B Lynn, Joel M Podolny et al.•American Journal of Sociology•2009

Unique citing works143
Citations per year17,88
Citation span2018 - 2026 (9)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedYes
Citation typesNeutral: 136

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae