Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Science Communication and the Problematic Impact of Descriptive Norms

Bibliographic Data

ID8399525
AuthorsUwe Peters (0000-0002-7103-3921, Leverhulme Trust, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume74
Issue3
Pages713-738
Publication date2023-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-0882 • E-ISSN: 1464-3537
PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1086/715001
OpenAlexW3157906320
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited63

When scientists or science reporters communicate research results to the public, this often involves ethical and epistemic risks. One such risk arises when scientific claims cause cognitive or behavioural changes in the audience that contribute to the self-fulfilment of these claims. I argue that the ethical and epistemic problems that such self-fulfilment effects may pose are much broader and more common than hitherto appreciated. Moreover, these problems are often due to a specific psychological phenomenon that has been neglected in the research on science communication: many people tend to conform to ‘descriptive norms’, that is, norms capturing (perceptions of) what others commonly do, think, or feel. Because of this tendency, science communication may frequently produce significant social harm. I contend that scientists have a responsibility to assess the risk of this potential harm and consider adopting strategies to mitigate it. I introduce one such strategy and argue that its implementation is independently well motivated by the fact that it helps improve scientific accuracy

Descriptive research · Download · Epistemology · Philosophy of science · Political science · Publishing · Scholarly communication · Social science · Sociology · World Wide Web · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Law · Philosophy · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

  • Are generics and negativity about social groups common on social media? A comparative analysis of Twitter (X) data

    Open Access•Uwe Peters, Ignacio Ojea Quintana•Synthese•2024

  • The philosophical debate on linguistic bias

    Open Access•Uwe Peters•Philosophical Psychology•2024

  • Reconceptualising the Psychological Theory of Generics

    Open Access•Tom Ralston•Philosophical Studies•2024

  • Algorithmic Political Bias Can Reduce Political Polarization

    Open Access•Uwe Peters•Philosophy & Technology•2022

  • Generics in science communication

    Open Access•Uwe Peters, Andrea Bertazzoli et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2026

  • How (many) descriptive claims about political polarization exacerbate polarization

    Open Access•Uwe Peters•Journal of Social and Political…•2021

  • Scientific realism, scientific practice, and science communication

    Open Access•Raimund Pils, Philipp Schoenegger•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2024

  • Hasty Generalizations Are Pervasive in Experimental Philosophy

    Open Access•Uwe Peters, Olivier Lemeire•Philosophy of Science•2024

  • Descriptive norms and gender diversity

    Open Access•Maliheh Paryavi, Iris Bohnet et al.•Journal of Behavioral Public…•2019

  • Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal

    Heather E Douglas, Heather Douglas•Science, Policy, and the…•2009

  • The Grammar of Society

    Open Access•Cristina Bicchieri•The grammar of society•2005

  • Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence.

    Hannah-Hanh D Nguyen, Ann Marie Ryan•Journal of Applied Psychology•2008

  • Wise interventions

    Gary M Walton, Timothy D Wilson•Psychological Review•2018

  • Managing social norms for persuasive impact

    Open Access•Robert B Cialdini, Linda J Demaine et al.•Social Influence•2006

  • A Meta-Analytic Review of Moral Licensing

    Open Access•Irene Blanken, Niels Van De Ven et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2015

  • Dynamic Norms Promote Sustainable Behavior, Even if It Is Counternormative

    Open Access•Gregg Sparkman, Gary M Walton•Psychological Science•2017

  • Constraints on Generality (COG)

    Open Access•Daniel J Simons, Yuichi Shoda et al.•Perspectives on Psychological…•2017

  • The behavioralist as tax collector

    Open Access•Michael Hallsworth, John A List et al.•Journal of Public Economics•2017

  • Descriptive and injunctive norms in college drinking

    Brian Borsari, Kate B Carey•Journal of Studies on Alcohol and…•2003

  • Crafting Normative Messages to Protect the Environment

    Open Access•Robert B Cialdini•Current Directions in Psychological…•2003

  • An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance.

    Toni Schmader, Michaela Johns et al.•Psychological Review•2008

  • The Original Sin of Cognition

    Sarah‐jane Leslie, Sarah-Jane Leslie et al.•The Journal of Philosophy•2017

  • Descriptive norms as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behaviour

    Open Access•Amanda Rivis, Paschal Sheeran•Current Psychology•2003

  • Science in a Democratic Society

    Philip Kitcher•Scientific Realism and Democratic…•2011

  • The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms

    Open Access•P Wesley Schultz, Jessica M Nolan et al.•Psychological Science•2007

  • The weirdest people in the world?

    Open Access•J Henrich, Steven J Heine et al.•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2010

  • What Is the Function of Confirmation Bias

    Open Access•Uwe Peters•Erkenntnis•2022

  • The DOs and DON’Ts in social norms

    Open Access•Magnus Bergquist, Andréas Nilsson•Journal of Theoretical Social…•2019

  • Trending Norms

    Open Access•Chad R Mortensen, Rebecca Neel et al.•Social Psychological and…•2019

  • Opposing ends of the spectrum

    Open Access•Michael A Cacciatore, Nick Browning et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2018

  • The credibility of scientific communication sources regarding climate change

    Open Access•Luis Sanz Menéndez, Laura Cruz Castro et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2019

  • A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct

    Robert B Cialdini, Carl A Kallgren et al.•Advances in Experimental Social…•1991

  • The Oxford Handbook of the Science of Science Communication

    Dan Kahan, Kathleen Hall Jamieson et al.•Oxford Handbook of the Science of…•2017

  • Democracy, Public Policy, and Lay Assessments of Scientific Testimony

    Open Access•Elizabeth Anderson•EPISTÉMÈ•2011

  • Norms in the Wild

    Cristina Bicchieri•Norms in the Wild•2017

  • How do Online Comments Affect Perceived Descriptive Norms of E-Cigarette Use? The Role of Quasi-Statistical Sense, Valence Perceptions, and Exposure Dosage

    Open Access•Jiaying Liu, Rui Shi•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2018

  • Healthy and unhealthy social norms and food selection. Findings from a field-experiment

    Open Access•Saar Mollen, R N Rimal et al.•Appetite•2013

  • Do performance avoidance goals moderate the effect of different types of stereotype threat on women’s math performance

    Open Access•Katherine M Finnigan, Katherine S Corker•Journal of Research in Personality•2016

  • On the scope and limits of generalizations in the social sciences

    Open Access•Daniel Little•Synthese•1993

  • Public scientific testimony in the scientific image

    Open Access•Mikkel Gerken•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2020

  • The Public Understanding of What? Laypersons’ Epistemic Needs, the Division of Cognitive Labor, and the Demarcation of Science

    Open Access•Arnon Keren•Philosophy of Science•2018

  • Should Some Knowledge Be Forbidden? The Case of Cognitive Differences Research

    Open Access•Janet A Kourany•Philosophy of Science•2016

  • The Potential Roles of Self-Fulfilling Prophecies, Stigma Consciousness, and Stereotype Threat in Linking Latino/a Ethnicity and Educational Outcomes

    Open Access•Max Guyll, Stephanie Madon et al.•Journal of Social Issues•2010

  • Understanding the Replication Crisis as a Base Rate Fallacy

    Open Access•Anthony Bird, Alexander Bird•The British Journal for the…•2021

  • Can the Science of Well-Being Be Objective

    Anna Alexandrova•The British Journal for the…•2018

  • On the emergence of descriptive norms

    Open Access•Ryan Muldoon, Chiara Lisciandra et al.•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2013

  • The ethics of scientific communication under uncertainty

    Open Access•Robert O Keohane, Melissa Lane et al.•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2014

  • Descriptive Social Norms and Motivation to Vote

    Alan S Gerber, Todd Rogers•The Journal of Politics•2009

  • Social Representations of Brain Research

    Open Access•Carla O’connor, Cliodhna O’connor et al.•Science Communication•2014

  • A threat in the air

    Claude M Steele•American Psychologist•1997

  • The Partisan Brain

    Open Access•Erik C Nisbet, Kathryn E Cooper et al.•The Annals of the American…•2015

  • Learning one's genetic risk changes physiology independent of actual genetic risk

    Open Access•Bradley P Turnwald, J Parker Goyer et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2018

  • Looping Kinds and Social Mechanisms

    Open Access•Jaakko Kuorikoski, Samuli Pöyhönen•Sociological Theory•2012

  • A Room with a Viewpoint

    Noah J Goldstein, Robert B Cialdini et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•2008

Unique citing works8
Citations per year1,6
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae