Two Forms of Inconsistency in Quantum Foundations
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8399646 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jeremy Steeger (0000-0003-2771-4145, University of Washington), Nicholas Teh (0000-0002-9698-466X, University of Notre Dame) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 72 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 1083-1110 |
| Publication date | 2021-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-0882 • E-ISSN: 1464-3537 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/bjps/axy071 |
| OpenAlex | W2771182226 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 25 |
Recently, there has been some discussion of how Dutch book arguments might be used to demonstrate the rational incoherence of certain hidden variable models of quantum theory (Feintzeig [2015]; Feintzeig and Fletcher [2017]; Wroński and Godziszewski [2017]). In this paper, we argue that the ‘form of inconsistency’ underlying this alleged irrationality is deeply and comprehensively related to the more familiar ‘inconsistency’ phenomenon of contextuality. Our main result is that the hierarchy of contextuality due to Abramsky and Brandenburger ([2011]) corresponds to a hierarchy of additivity/convexity-violations that yields formal Dutch books of different strengths. We then use this result to provide a partial assessment of whether these formal Dutch books can be given a convincing normative interpretation.
Epistemology · Hierarchy · Irrationality · Kochen–Specker theorem · Mathematical economics · Phenomenon · Physics · Political science · Quantum · Quantum mechanics · Rationality · Variable (mathematics) · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Quantum Mechanics and Applications
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |