Double Marking Revisited
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8405745 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Val Brooks (University of Warwick, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2004 |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 29-46 |
| Publication date | 2004-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | British Journal of Educational Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-1005 • E-ISSN: 1467-8527 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-8527.2004.00253.x |
| OpenAlex | W2146292134 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 14 |
In 2002, the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA) published the report of an independent panel of experts into maintaining standards at Advanced Level (A-Level). One of its recommendations was for: ‘limited experimental double marking of scripts in subjects such as English to determine whether the strategy would signi-ficantly reduce errors of measurement’ (p. 24). This recommendation provided the impetus for this paper which reviews the all but forgotten literature on double marking and considers its relevance now. \n
Mathematics education · Political science · Relevance (law) · Reliability (semiconductor) · Scripting language · Computer Science · EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning · Law · Psychology
Why is a Longer Test Usually a More Reliable Test
Double‐marking Students' Work
Reply to Comments on “Essay Marking Experiments”
The Reliability of Marking of General Certificate of Secondary Education Scripts
A social science teacher
Multiple Marking
The Marking of English Composition in Grammar School Selection 1
Symposium
Multiple Marking of a Matriculation Biology Essay Question
Enhancing Quality in Assessment
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,13 |
| Citation span | 2011 - 2025 (15) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |