A response by the author
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8414577 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Richard J Smethurst (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1987 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 49-52 |
| Publication date | 1987-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-4810 • E-ISSN: 1472-6033 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14672715.1987.10409880 |
| OpenAlex | W2328695596 |
| Language | EN |
I was surprised to receive a letter from the editor of BCAS asking me to reply to not one, but two reviews of my book. I am somewhat flattered to be dealt with twice in the same issue of BCAS and would like to take this opportunity to reply first to John Lie's review, “Fascist Japan As Number One,” and then to Herbert Bix's stimulating article, “Class Conflict in Rural Japan: On Historical Methodology.”
Class (philosophy · Epistemology · Political science · Sociology · History · Italian Fascism and Post-war Society · Philosophy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |