Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

False confessions

How can psychology so basic be so counterintuitive

Bibliographic Data

ID8713338
AuthorsSaul M Kassin (0000-0002-0495-8377, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume72
Issue9
Pages951-964
Publication date2017-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Psychologist (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-066X • E-ISSN: 1935-990X
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1037/amp0000195
PMID29283646
OpenAlexW2776394294
LanguageEN
Citations received10

Recent advances in DNA technology have shined a spotlight on thousands of innocent people wrongfully convicted for crimes they did not commit-many of whom had been induced to confess. The scientific study of false confessions, which helps to explain this phenomenon, has proved highly paradoxical. On the one hand, it is rooted in reliable core principles of psychology (e.g., research on reinforcement and decision-making, obedience to authority, and confirmation biases). On the other hand, false confessions are highly counterintuitive if not inconceivable to most people (e.g., as seen in actual trial outcomes as well as studies of jury decision making). This article describes both the psychology underlying false confessions and the psychology that predicts the counterintuitive nature of this same phenomenon. It then notes that precisely because they are so counterintuitive, false confessions are often "invisible," resulting in a form of inattentional blindness, and are slow to change in the face of contradiction, illustrating belief perseverance. This article concludes by suggesting ways in which psychologists can help to prevent future miscarriages of justice by advocating for reforms to policy and practice and helping to raise public awareness. (PsycINFO Database Record

Commit · Counterintuitive · Economic Justice · Epistemology · Jury · MEDLINE · Obedience · Political science · PsycINFO · Computer Science · Deception detection and forensic psychology · Psychology · Law · Philosophy · Social Psychology

  • Evaluating confessions in context

    Open Access•Madison B Hynes, Brent Snook•Psychology, Crime & Law•2026

  • Cumulative Disadvantage

    Open Access•Kyle C Scherr, Allison D Redlich et al.•Perspectives on Psychological…•2020

  • Confessing dishonor

    Open Access•Aaron L Pomerantz, Ryan P Brown et al.•Current Psychology•2025

  • An exploratory examination of intellectual disability and mental illness associated with alleged false confessions

    Open Access•Melanie Clark Mogavero•Behavioral Sciences & the Law•2020

  • Malaysian police officers’ perceptions of interrogations and confessions

    Open Access•Kai Li Chung•The Police Journal Theory…•2025

  • Polizeiliche Beschuldigtenvernehmung

    Open Access•Jennifer Maria Schell‐Leugers, Natalie Hittmeyer et al.•Monatsschrift für Kriminologie…•2024

  • Straight Dope on Being Duped

    Richard W Bloom•The American Journal of Psychology•2021

  • The detection of deception during trials

    Open Access•Vincent Denault, Norah E Dunbar et al.•The International Journal of…•2019

  • You’ve got the wrong Shorty!”

    Open Access•Helen Fraser•Australian Journal of Linguistics•2025

  • The Truth Project

    Open Access•D M Markowitz, K G Blackburn et al.•Journal of Language and Social…•2022

Unique citing works10
Citations per year1,43
Citation span2019 - 2026 (8)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 10

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae