The Neo-Pseudo-Suffix '-eroo
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8728534 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Harold Wentworth (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1942 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 10-10 |
| Publication date | 1942-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Speech (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-1283 • E-ISSN: 1527-2133 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/486851 |
| OpenAlex | W2330187200 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
IN CERTAIN circles-notably radio, sports, advertising, and motion pictures-one often does not pay the check, take a dive, tell a joke, or listen to swing music. Instead he pays the checkeroo, takes a diveroo, tells a jokeroo, and listens to swingaroo. Do such terms as these merely end with meaningless extra syllables? Sometimes they do, but not always. There is a perceptible semantic variation between the new forms with tails and the old acaudate ones. That is, it may not be quite so jarring to the playwright's sensibilities to read that his work is a flopperoo as to read that it is-tersely, bluntly, rudely-a flop. And the hapless sapperoo or bummaroo seems somehow less so than he used to be before the suffixion. Common as such new words are, little has been written about them.l Some fifty have come to my attention; no special search was made in the numerous likely sources particularized below. The eye, it cannot choose but see; we cannot bid the ear stop listening to the radio. And nearly thirty, or about a third of all the quotations below, were heard on the radio
Linguistics · Suffix · Lexicography and Language Studies · Media, Gender, and Advertising · Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism · History · Philosophy
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,04 |
| Citation span | 1957 - 2016 (60) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |