Questions Concerning Certain Claims Made for the ‘New List’
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8903102 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Short Short (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 267-267 |
| Publication date | 2013-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0009-1774 • E-ISSN: 1558-9587 |
| Publisher | Indiana University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.49.3.267 |
| OpenAlex | W2035841050 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 6 |
Peirce’s early essay ‘On a New List of Categories’ has been claimed to be essential reading for those who would understand his philosophy, even that it is the ‘keystone’ of his ‘system’. I argue that the essay is critical to the evolution of his thought but that reading it is not essential to understanding his other writings; in fact, his later writings contradict it. Peirce’s own claim that this essay contains his ‘one contribution to philosophy’ has been misunderstood
Information retrieval · Computer Science · Origins and Evolution of Life · Philosophy and History of Science · Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education
| Citations per year | 0.2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2021 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |