A Century of John and Evelyn Dewey's Schools of To-morrow
Rousseau, Recorded Knowledge, and Race in the Philosopher's Most Problematic Text
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8924686 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Thomas Fallace (0000-0002-5417-7077, William Paterson University, corresponding author), Victoria Fantozzi (0000-0003-0246-5816, Manhattanville College) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 129-152 |
| Publication date | 2015-03-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Educational Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0013-1946 • E-ISSN: 1532-6993 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00131946.2015.1015352 |
| OpenAlex | W2003280127 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 39 |
A century ago, John Dewey and his daughter Evelyn published Schools of To-morrow to nearly universal acclaim. However, over the course of the 20th century, critics of Dewey have drawn upon Schools of To-morrow to accuse him of being an uncritical disciple of French philosopher, Jean Rousseau, of being opposed to the transmission of content to students, and most recently of endorsing a curriculum that patronized Black students. As a result, the text has become John Dewey's most controversial and problematic. In this historical study, we seek to place Schools of To-morrow in its historical, intellectual, and social context. The first part of the study traces the writing and publication of the text, as well as its changing reception over the past century. The second part of the study directly responds to the three criticisms previously cited: that Dewey was a disciple of Rousseau, that Dewey was opposed to the transmission of content knowledge, and that Dewey endorsed the racially segregated school system of Indianapolis depicted in the text. Drawing upon Dewey's other writings, his course syllabi, his personal correspondence, and lecture notes, we argue that the first two accusations are unfounded, but the third is partially accurate, although incomplete. We conclude that Schools of To-morrow is an undervalued text in the Dewey cannon that warrants closer study
Art · Content (measure theory · Context (archaeology · Curriculum · Literature · Pedagogy · Sociology · Syllabus · History · Philosophy · Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education · Race, History, and American Society
John Dewey, subject purposes and schools of tomorrow
Réponse à la recension de « John Dewey – Écrits sur les religions et le naturalisme. Recueil de textes traduits et introduits par Joan Stavo- Debauge » par Émir Mahieddin
Politics of the Press
Perspectives on the 1933 Exhibition
Toward a History of Modernism in Washington
Exhibiting the Negro
Student Art in the United States National Museum
Cultural literacy
The retreat of scientific racism
Education for extinction
The Education of Blacks in the South, 1860-1935
The Great Chain of Being
Human nature and conduct
Race, culture, and evolution
Sociology and the race problem
Black Neighbors
The Origins of American Social Science
Repeating the Race Experience
German Philosophy and Politics
The Evolutionary Method as Applied to Morality
Social Studies in Secondary Education
Schools of Tomorrow
Black Neighbors
Dewey and the Dilemma of Race
The metaphysical club
Whiteness of a Different Color
The Great Chain of Being
Social Control
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,88 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2022 (5) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |