Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Assessing Literary Interpretation Skills

Bibliographic Data

ID8935699
AuthorsSylvie Debevec Henning (State University of New York, corresponding author)
Year1992
Volume25
Issue4
Pages339-344
Publication date1992-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueForeign Language Annals (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0015-718X • E-ISSN: 1944-9720
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1944-9720.1992.tb00556.x
OpenAlexW2113085803
LanguageEN
Citations received3

Along with other foreign language colleagues, the author has been participating in a comprehensive assessment project. Having accepted the principle of assessment based on proficiency rather than fact‐acquisition for the four language skills, the group tried to apply the same principle to literary interpretation. ACTFL has no rating scale in this area, so the author undertook to elaborate one. The four levels of the author's scale are based on a graduated arrangement of interpretive activities, each composed of an action and a textual or contextual component. Since literary interpretation requires strong reading comprehension, the novice level presupposes an intermediate‐high level of reading comprehension. The notional components are sequenced from the specific and concrete to the general and abstract (e.g., from plot events to temporal structures). They are also arranged to move readers out of a self‐oriented (biographical) perspective into a more world‐oriented one (e.g., from character description to the work's relation to its socio‐cultural or historical contexts). Finally, the components are increasingly self‐conscious. The functions progress from recognizing and distinguishing through describing to understanding and finally to analyzing critically. The same textual/contextual component may appear at several levels, each time, however, matched with a different action. The group is here concerned with the assessment of interpretive proficiency, not coverage. Consequently, the focus is on literary components that can be used to interpret any work, both as a coherent textual structure and as an element in larger contextual frameworks

Action (physics · Component (thermodynamics · Comprehension · Interpretation (philosophy · Linguistics · Notional amount · Perspective (graphical · Plot (graphics · Reading (process · Reading comprehension · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Psychology · Translation Studies and Practices

  • Sarah and Amber

    Open Access•Kathleen Bueno•Foreign Language Annals•2003

  • The Process of Reading‐to‐Write Used by a Skilled Spanish‐As‐a‐Foreign‐Language Student

    Open Access•Marcela Ruiz‐Furies•Foreign Language Annals•1999

  • Task Representation in Foreign Language Reading‐to‐Write

    Open Access•Marcela Rub‐Funes•Foreign Language Annals•2001

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,11
Citation span1999 - 2003 (5)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae