Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The effect of providing feedback and feedforward in prosody instruction for developing listening comprehension skills by interpreter trainees

Bibliographic Data

ID8938186
AuthorsMahmood Yenkimaleki (0000-0002-8712-9004, Nahavand Higher Education Complex Bu‐Ali Sina University Hamedan Iran, corresponding author), Vincent J Van Heuven (0000-0003-3631-5699, Leiden University Centre for Linguistics Leiden University Leiden Netherlands), Mostafa Hosseini (0000-0002-5066-3924, Department of Foreign Languages Bu‐Ali Sina University Hamedan Iran)
Year2023
Volume57
Issue1
Pages184-200
Publication date2023-09-20
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueForeign Language Annals (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0015-718X • E-ISSN: 1944-9720
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/flan.12725
OpenAlexW4386890775
LanguageEN
References cited36

The present study examines the effect of feedback (FB) and feedforward (FF) in prosody instruction for developing listening comprehension skills in the nonnative language by interpreter trainees, using a pretest–posttest–delayed posttest design. Three groups of 25 interpreter trainees at Bu‐Ali Sina University in Iran took part in the study, all groups receiving the same amount of instruction (10 h over 5 weeks). The control group listened to/viewed authentic audio recordings and movies in English, discussed their contents, and completed a variety of listening comprehension tasks but received no prosody instruction. The first experimental group spent part of the time on theoretical explanation of, and practical exercises with, English prosody by an instructor by providing FB when teaching prosody while the second experimental group was provided FF when teaching prosody. Versions of Longman's Test of English as a Foreign Language English proficiency test (paper‐based) were used to assess listening comprehension at pretest, immediate posttest and delayed posttest. The findings revealed that the prosody instruction by providing FB enhanced the listening comprehension skills of the interpreter trainees more than by providing FF. The practical implications of the study would be that in the given circumstances where only limited curricular time is available for instruction and practice, a judicious choice can be made to lend priority to providing FB in prosody instruction for developing listening comprehension skills by interpreter trainees rather than to the providing FF

Active listening · Comprehension · Interpreter · Linguistics · Listening comprehension · Mathematics education · Prosody · Test (biology · Communication · Computer Science · EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning · Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare · Psychology · Second Language Learning and Teaching

  • Roles for Corrective Feedback in Second Language Instruction

    Open Access•Roy Lyster•Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics•2012

  • Input and Evidence

    Susanne E Carroll, Susanne Carroll•Input and evidence•2001

  • Teaching and Learning Second Language Listening

    Christine C M Goh, Larry Vandergrift•Teaching and learning second…•2012

  • Descriptive statistics and normality tests for statistical data

    Open Access•Anshul Gupta, Prabhakar Mishra et al.•Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia•2019

  • Moving from Feedback to Feedforward in IBDP classrooms

    Open Access•Nicky Dulfer, Firoozeh Akhlaghi Koopaei•Journal of Research in…•2021

  • Relative contribution of explicit teaching of segmentals vs. prosody to the quality of consecutive interpreting by Farsi-to-English interpreting trainees

    Mahmood Yenkimaleki, Vincent J Van Heuven•Interactive Learning Environments•2023

  • Moving feedback forward

    Paul Orsmond, Stephen J Maw et al.•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•2013

  • ‘Feed‐forward’

    Neil A Duncan, Neil Duncan•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•2007

  • Is consecutive interpreting easier than simultaneous interpreting? – a corpus-based study of lexical simplification in interpretation

    Qianxi Lv, Junying Liang•Perspectives•2018

  • The role of feedback and feedforward in the teaching of pronunciation—an overview

    Open Access•C L J De Bot•System•1980

  • Effects of attention to segmental vs. suprasegmental features on the speech intelligibility and comprehensibility of the EFL learners targeting the perception or production-focused practice

    Open Access•Mahmood Yenkimaleki, Vincent J Van Heuven•System•2021

  • Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms

    Open Access•Roy Lyster, Kiyoshi Saito et al.•Language Teaching•2013

  • Research into practice

    Open Access•Suzanne Graham•Language Teaching•2017

  • Formative assessment and self-regulated learning

    David J Nicol, David Nicol et al.•Studies in Higher Education•2006

  • Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalyzed

    Open Access•Rebecca M Dauer•Journal of Phonetics•1983

  • Differing perceptions in the feedback process

    David Carle•Studies in Higher Education•2006

  • Developing sustainable feedback practices

    David Carle, Diane Salter et al.•Studies in Higher Education•2011

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae