The Japanese Skills Test as an On‐Demand Placement Test
Validity Comparisons and Reliability
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8939596 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sanae Eda (University of Kansas, corresponding author), Masayuki Itomitsu (Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center), Mari Noda (0000-0002-6112-7983, Cornell University) |
| Year | 2008 |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 218-236 |
| Publication date | 2008-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Foreign Language Annals (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0015-718X • E-ISSN: 1944-9720 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2008.tb03290.x |
| OpenAlex | W2164745816 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 4 |
This study and analysis are designed to find a common, practical measurement tool that may be used for intra‐ and interprogram evaluation of Japanese programs, especially in the higher education context. First, three previous methods of evaluation (the Oral Proficiency Interview, the Nihongo Noryoku Shiken or Japanese Language Proficiency Test, and the Simple Performance‐Oriented Test) are analyzed for strengths and weaknesses as common, practical measurement tools. The Japanese Skills Test (JSKIT) is suggested as superior to these three, especially in distinguishing first‐ and second‐year ability in the language. The JSKIT is evaluated on the basis of being both valid and reliable as a test. This is supported by data collected at a nine‐week summer intensive language program during the summers of 2000 and 2001, at entry and exit points
Context (archaeology · Developmental psychology · Geography · Language assessment · Language proficiency · Mathematics education · Psychometrics · Reliability (semiconductor · Strengths and weaknesses · Test (biology · Test validity · Validity · Computer Science · EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning · Psychology · Second Language Learning and Teaching · Social Psychology · Student Assessment and Feedback
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,13 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2018 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |