Commoning the compact city

The role of old and new commons in urban development

Bibliographic Data

ID8946201
AuthorsJessica Verheij (0000-0003-4197-4701, University of Bern, corresponding author), Jean-David Gerber (0000-0001-9111-9071, University of Bern), Stephane Nahrath (0000-0002-4267-4498, University of Lausanne)
Year2024
Volume152
Pages104019-104019
Publication date2024-05-09
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGeoforum (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0016-7185 • E-ISSN: 1872-9398
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104019
OpenAlexW4396785661
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited42

Although densification is generally seen to contribute to more sustainable urban development, it is often linked to market-oriented and for-profit development, contributing to the enclosure of urban space. We analyse how densification can take a different path through processes of commoning. We particularly aim to understand how commoning initiatives can contribute to new institutional arrangements that counteract enclosure and commodification in densification. We furthermore aim to contribute to conceptual clarity in the debate on urban commons by emphasizing the different roles of so-called ‘old’ and ‘new’ commons in urban development. Our analytical framework builds on a new institutionalist approach which stresses the analysis of localized and temporary institutional arrangements negotiated among actors in a given situation. We rely on a detailed case-study of a densification project in the city of Bern (Switzerland), where publicly-owned land was redeveloped into cooperative housing and urban green space. Our findings show how densification leads to a transition phase in which institutional arrangements defining land uses and allocating access and use rights are renegotiated. These are crucial moments where processes of commoning can shape the outcome of densification, although not independently from the supportive action of the public actor. We underline the potential of new commons, even when typically transitional, unstable, and temporary. Contrary to old commons, their potential lies not so much in the ability for long-lasting resource management, but rather in the capacity to change the conditions of governance during the transition between land uses, advancing more socially-sustainable outcomes in a key moment of the urban redevelopment process

Commons · Political science · Politics · Right to the city · Sociology · Law · Urban Agriculture and Sustainability · Urban and Rural Development Challenges · Urban Planning and Governance

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access