The Rulers now on Earth’
Locke's Two Treatises and the Revolution of 1688
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 8956705 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Charles D Tarlton (State University of New York, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 1985 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 279-298 |
| Data de publicação | 1985-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | The Historical Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0018-246X • E-ISSN: 1469-5103 |
| Editora | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0018246x00003113 |
| OpenAlex | W2048022497 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 4 |
| Referências citadas | 8 |
When we believed that Locke had written Two treatises of government to justify the Glorious Revolution, we could say a great deal about his purposes in relation to the events of 1688–89. The book served to interpret those events, to disclose their underlying meaning; philosophy and action were joined in such a manner that both gained lustre from the link. But, now we have generally accepted the view that Locke actually wrote Two treatises in the partisan heat of the Exclusion debate, and we have stopped saying very much of anything about the book's relation to William III and the events of the year in which Locke anonymously published it
Action (physics · Art · Epistemology · Literature · Meaning (existential · Political science · Relation (database · American Constitutional Law and Politics · History · Law · Philosophy · Political Theory and Influence · Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment
The Political Thought of John Locke
A Rope of Sand
Edmund Bohun and Jus Gentium in the Revolution Debate, 1689–1693
The Exclusion Controversy, Pamphleteering, and Locke's Two Treatises
Two treatises of government
The Reception of Locke's Two Treatises of Government 1690–1705
The Idea of Conquest in Controversies Over the 1688 Revolution
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,11 |
| Intervalo de citações | 1988 - 1992 (5) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 4 |