VI. Britain, Siam and the Malay Peninsula, 1906–1909
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8958377 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ira Klein (American University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1969 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 119-136 |
| Publication date | 1969-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Historical Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0018-246X • E-ISSN: 1469-5103 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0018246x0000412x |
| OpenAlex | W1987266383 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 3 |
The British ‘New Imperialism’ has frequently been described as a monolith, generated in the opinion of Hobson and others by the search for capital outlets and markets, or in Schumpeter's analysis by the residue of feudalism.2 These mechanistic interpretations allow little importance to mediating philosophies or institutions, to anti-imperialist convictions or inner divisiveness, or to conditions in indigenous societies. Views of the uniqueness of the New Imperialism, and also of imperial expansion being simply determined, were powerfully challenged by Professor Gallagher and Dr Robinson in their article, ‘The Imperialism of Free Trade’.3
Ancient history · Archaeology · Biology · Capital (architecture · Feudalism · Indigenous · Malay · Peninsula · Political science · Uniqueness · Asian Studies and History · Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies · History · Law · Philosophy · Socioeconomic Development in Asia
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,07 |
| Citation span | 1971 - 1999 (29) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |