The challenge to laïcité
Church, state and schools in Vichy France, 1940–1944
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8958551 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nicholas Atkin (University of Reading, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1992 |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 151-169 |
| Publication date | 1992-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Historical Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0018-246X • E-ISSN: 1469-5103 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0018246x00025644 |
| OpenAlex | W2094241381 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 7 |
This article examines the role which education played in church/state relations during the Occupation. It begins with an evaluation of catholic reactions to the defeat and explains why so many church leaders were quick to blame military collapse on the laïcité of the republican educational system. It then investigates the policies which the church wanted to see pursued in regard to schools and assesses how these were received by the Vichy government. Analysis of these issues reveals that Vichy was not as pro-clerical as is sometimes believed. Although initially sympathetic to church requests, by 1942 the regime had become reluctant to introduce any measure that might provoke religious division. At the same time, the article illustrates that French Catholicism was not a monolithic bloc. Arguments over education served only to intensify divisions already present within the church and soon led to catholic disenchantment with the Vichy regime
Blame · Church History · Disenchantment · Government (linguistics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · State (computer science · Classics · European Political History Analysis · Historical and Political Studies · Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis · History · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Public Administration · Social Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.03 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1997 - 1997 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |