Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

From Suarez to Filmer

A Reappraisal

Bibliographic Data

ID8958720
AuthorsJohann P Sommerville (St. John's College of Nursing, corresponding author)
Year1982
Volume25
Issue3
Pages525-540
Publication date1982-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Historical Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0018-246X • E-ISSN: 1469-5103
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0018246x00011778
OpenAlexW2160086282
LanguageEN
Citations received25
References cited8

English political thought in the early seventeenth century is often regarded in terms of the disagreements between the king and his parliaments, and of debates amongst lawyers on the nature and contents of the ancient constitution. But a large proportion of the political writings of early seventeenth-century English theorists was directed against the views of Catholic authors. Sir Robert Filmer devoted much of his Patriarcha to refuting the theories of those two great pillars of counter-reformation Catholicism, Bellarmine and Suarez. Suarez's Defensio fidei was burned at Paul's Cross on 21 November 1613. James I believed that by ‘setting up the People above their naturall King’ the political thinking of the Jesuits laid ‘ an excellent ground in Divinitie for all rebels and rebellious people’. One aim of this paper is to suggest that many of the most characteristic ideas on politics of English writers in the early seventeenth century can best be understood in the context of their polemical aim: the refutation of the seditious doctrines of the Papists. This is particularly true of patriarchalism, a subject on which Filmer was no innovator

Art · Constitution · Context (archaeology · Innovator · Literature · Political science · Politics · Subject (documents · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Classics · History · Law · Philosophy · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity

  • As fontes democráticas do poder civil segundo Francisco Suárez

    Open Access•Alfredo Storck•DoisPontos•2020

  • The Politics of Liberty in England and Revolutionary America

    Open Access•Lee Ward•Politics of Liberty in England…•2004

  • The conditions of enquiry

    Open Access•Paul F Grendler•The Cambridge history of…•1988

  • The conditions of enquiry

    Open Access•John F D'Amico, John F D’Amico•The Cambridge history of…•1988

  • Absolutism and royalism

    Open Access•Johann P Sommerville•The Cambridge history of…•1991

  • Sovereignty and the mixed constitution

    Julian H Franklin•Jean Bodin•2017

  • Sovereignty and the mixed constitution

    Open Access•Julian H Franklin•The Cambridge history of…•1991

  • Pufendorf

    Open Access•Alfred Dufour•The Cambridge history of…•1991

  • Catholic resistance theory, Ultramontanism, and the royalist response, 1580—1620

    Open Access•J H M Salmon•The Cambridge history of…•1991

  • The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450–1700

    Open Access•Mark Goldie, James H Burns•The Cambridge history of…•1991

  • Philosophy and humanistic disciplines

    Open Access•Brian Vickers•The Cambridge history of…•1988

  • Christian obedience and authority, 1520–1550

    Open Access•Francis Oakley•The Cambridge history of…•1991

  • Leveller democracy and the Puritan Revolution

    Open Access•David Wootton•The Cambridge history of…•1991

  • Logic and language

    Open Access•Lisa Jardine•The Cambridge history of…•1988

  • The Cambridge history of Renaissance philosophy

    Charles B Schmitt, Quentin Skinner et al.•The Cambridge history of…•1988

  • Appendices

    Open Access•Charles B Schmitt•The Cambridge history of…•1988

  • Problems of knowledge and action

    Open Access•Nicholas Jardine•The Cambridge history of…•1988

  • Calvinism and resistance theory, 1550–1580

    Open Access•Robert M Kingdon•The Cambridge history of…•1991

  • Italian political thought, 1450–1530

    Open Access•Nicolai Rubinstein•The Cambridge history of…•1991

  • Transalpine humanism

    Open Access•Brendan Bradshaw•The Cambridge history of…•1991

  • Mary Astell

    Open Access•Patricia Springborg•Mary Astell•2005

  • Metaphysics

    Open Access•Charles H Lohr•The Cambridge history of…•1988

  • El pensamiento político de Suárez en el De opere sex dierum y sus nexos con Filmer y Locke

    Open Access•Leopoldo José Prieto López•Isegoría•2020

  • Property, Space and Sacred History in John Locke's Two Treatises of Government

    Open Access•Tom Pye•Modern Intellectual History•2016

  • Sharers in the Divine Image

    Elisabeth Rain Kincaid•Political Theology•2018

  • Natural Rights Theories

    Open Access•Richard Tuck•Natural Rights Theories•1979

  • The Revolution of the Saints

    Michael Walzer•The Revolution of the Saints•1965

  • Two Treatises of Government, by John Locke, Peter Laslett

    Open Access•Rosalie L Colie•Political Science Quarterly•1961

  • On Some Political Theories of the Early Jesuits

    Open Access•John Neville Figgis•Transactions of the Royal…•1897

  • Two treatises of government

    John Locke, Ian Shapiro et al.•Two Treatises of Government•1988

Unique citing works25
Citations per year0,66
Citation span1988 - 2020 (33)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 24

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae