Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Institutional thickening and innovation

Reflections on the remapping of the Great Bear Rainforest

Bibliographic Data

ID8962347
AuthorsAlex Clapp (Department of Geography Simon Fraser University Burnaby British Columbia V5A 1S6, corresponding author), Roger Hayter (0000-0002-2008-9167, Department of Geography Simon Fraser University Burnaby British Columbia V5A 1S6), Julia Affolderbach (0000-0002-9520-7033, Department of Geography University of Hull Hull HU6 7RX), Laura Guzman (0000-0002-1087-7514, Department of Geography Simon Fraser University Burnaby British Columbia V5A 1S6)
Year2016
Volume41
Issue3
Pages244-257
Publication date2016-03-24
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTransactions of the Institute of British Geographers (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-2754 • E-ISSN: 1475-5661
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/tran.12119
OpenAlexW2309441227
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited36

As a response to forest conflict, contemporary remapping refers to re‐evaluations of resource values, new and diverse forms of governance among stakeholders, and compromises within patterns of land use that give greater emphasis to environmental and cultural priorities. This paper elaborates the processes of remapping by examining the role of institutional innovation in conflict resolution, with particular reference to the iconic Great Bear Rainforest of British Columbia. After years of conflict and protest, peace in the Great Bear Rainforest was heralded by an interim agreement in 2006, with final ratification likely in 2016. Conceptually, a four‐legged stakeholder model identifies the main institutional interests and their interactions through learning and bargaining. New forms of governance were created to bring the stakeholders together in constructive dialogue and then to reach and implement acceptable bargains. Analytically, the paper examines how this agreement has worked in practice by reflecting on the emergence of novel institutions that integrate the interests of key stakeholders. The discussion identifies six bilateral negotiations between: industrial and environmental interests; federal and provincial governments and aboriginal peoples; government and environmental interests; government and industry; industry and aboriginal peoples; and environmental groups and local communities. The remapping process has produced a thickening architecture of institutions that remain experimental even as they seek to promote sustainability, resilience and legitimacy

Corporate governance · Economics · Environmental governance · Environmental resource management · Government (linguistics · Legitimacy · Management · Negotiation · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Ratification · Resource (disambiguation · Sociology · Stakeholder · Transnational governance · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Forest Management and Policy · Law · Mining and Resource Management · Public Administration

  • Collaborative governance in the making

    Open Access•Kathrin Böhling, Böhling Kathrin•Land Use Policy•2019

  • Greening the cloud

    Open Access•Jerry Patchell, Roger Hayter•Cambridge Journal of Regions…•2021

  • Towards a collaborative (public-private partnership) approach to research and development in Canada’s forest sector

    Open Access•Roger Hayter, Alex Clapp•Forest Policy and Economics•2020

  • The local planning-economic development nexus in transitioning resource-industry towns

    Open Access•Roger Hayter, Stephan Nieweler•Journal of Rural Studies•2018

  • Friction, failure and futures

    Open Access•Diogo Gaspar Silva, D E S Silva et al.•Environment and Planning C…•2026

  • Hyper-peripheral regional evolution

    Open Access•Tom Barratt, Anton Klarin•Geographical Research•2022

  • Counter-institutionalizing First Nation-Crown relations in British Columbia

    Open Access•Anthony W Persaud, Terre Satterfield et al.•Environment and Planning A…•2020

  • A disturbance innovation hypothesis

    Open Access•Timothy D Baird, Brian C Chaffin et al.•Geographical Journal•2017

  • Minetown, Milltown, Railtown

    Rex Lucas•Minetown, Milltown, Railtown•1971

  • Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions

    Open Access•Lars Coenen, Paul Benneworth et al.•Research Policy•2012

  • Community managed forests and forest protected areas

    Open Access•Luciana Porter-Bolland, Edward A Ellis et al.•Forest Ecology and Management•2012

  • Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance

    Open Access•Douglass C North•Institutions, Institutional…•1990

  • The High Stakes of Protecting Indigenous Homelands

    Lynne Davis•International Journal of Canadian…•2009

  • The Fight for the West

    Mette J Brogden, James B Greenberg•Human Organization•2003

  • A quantitative review of the representation of forest conflicts across the world

    David Gritten, Blas Mola-Yudego et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2013

  • A new model for sustainable development

    Open Access•Gordon McGee, Andrea Cullen et al.•Environment Development and…•2010

  • Conservancies in Coastal British Columbia

    Open Access•MurrayB Rutherford, Jessica Stronghill et al.•Conservation and Society•2015

  • Prioritizing Engagement for Sustainable Adaptation to Climate Change

    Douglas Bardsley, Geoffrey P Rogers•Society & Natural Resources•2010

  • Adversarial Science

    Roger Alex Clapp, Cecelia Mortenson•Society & Natural Resources•2011

  • Forest Management and Economic Growth in British Columbia

    F J Anderson, M B Percy et al.•Canadian Public Policy•1987

  • Restructuring on a vertiginous plateau

    Open Access•Klaus Edenhoffer, Roger Hayter•Geoforum•2012

  • American foundations in the Great Bear Rainforest

    Open Access•Delacey Tedesco•Geoforum•2015

  • Emerging Geographies of Conservation and Indigenous Land in Australia

    Heather Moorcroft, Michael Adams•Australian Geographer•2014

  • Reinterpreting Core and Periphery in Australia's Mineral and Energy Resources Boom

    Neil Argent•Australian Geographer•2013

  • Environmental Bargaining and Boundary Organizations

    Julia Affolderbach, Roger Alex Clapp et al.•Annals of the Association of…•2012

  • The War in the Woods”

    Roger Hayter•Annals of the Association of…•2003

  • Relocating resource peripheries to the core of economic geography's theorizing

    Open Access•Roger Hayter, Trevor J Barnes et al.•Area•2003

  • Wilderness and Cultural Landscapes

    Jim Russell, Mirjana Jambrecina•Australian Geographer•2002

  • The Politics of Nature in British Columbia’s Great Bear Rainforest

    Open Access•Jason Dempsey, Jessica Dempsey•Geoforum•2011

  • Wilderness ethics and political ecology

    Open Access•Roger Alex Clapp•Political Geography•2004

  • From government to governance in forest planning? Lessons from the case of the British Columbia Great Bear Rainforest initiative

    Open Access•Michael Howlett, J Rayner et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2009

  • Introduction to World Forestry

    I G Simmons, Jack Westoby•Geographical Journal•1990

  • Sustaining Sustained Yield

    Open Access•Prudham, Scott Prudham•Environment and Planning D…•2007

  • Perspectives on the Post-1984 Restructuring of State Forestry in New Zealand

    Open Access•Michael Roche, M M Roche•Environment and Planning A…•1990

  • Environmental Bargains

    Open Access•Julia Affolderbach•Economic Geography•2011

  • The Unquiet Woods

    Harry W Blair, Harry Blair et al.•Pacific Affairs•1992

Unique citing works8
Citations per year0,89
Citation span2017 - 2026 (10)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 8

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae