Winnicott's splitting headache

Considering the gap between Jungian and object relations concepts

Bibliographic Data

ID8982786
AuthorsJeffrey Rubin Morey (Torrey Pines Institute For Molecular Studies, corresponding author)
Year2005
Volume50
Issue3
Pages333-350
Publication date2005-05-31
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Analytical Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0021-8774 • E-ISSN: 1465-5922
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.0021-8774.2005.00536.x
PMID15926954
OpenAlexW1490939368
LanguageEN
Citations received10
References cited9

This paper examines some difficulties inherent in the process of integration of potentially divergent theoretical positions. It is noted that there is an increasing tendency toward integration of Jungian theory with various models from psychoanalysis and other scientific disciplines. This trend can be understood as relating to the larger post-modern current operating in the scientific and cultural communities. As an element of the Zeitgeist, theory integration can proceed with a lack of critical stance on the process itself. An argument is developed on theoretical grounds for urging caution in the implementation of theory integration. The integrative process is examined using dream material from D. W. Winnicott in conjunction with his review of Memories, Dreams, Reflections. Through this discussion, some implications are examined as to the viability of linking Jungian and developmental models

Analytical psychology · Argument (complex analysis · Dream · Element (criminal law · Epistemology · Object (grammar · Process (computing · Psychoanalysis · Psychotherapist · Zeitgeist · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology · Computer Science · Jungian Analytical Psychology · Philosophy · Psychology · Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub