Complicity, entanglement, and translation
Three English/Afrikaans texts
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9002897 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nicole Devarenne (0000-0002-5605-7642, University of Dundee, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 61-76 |
| Publication date | 2013-02-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Commonwealth Literature (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0021-9894 • E-ISSN: 1741-6442 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0021989412470942 |
| OpenAlex | W2086496099 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 9 |
Using Mark Sanders’ definition, Afrikaans is a “complicit” language, both in terms of the assistance it has given to apartheid, and in the way it evidences cultural and linguistic entanglement. But the texts examined in this article, J.M. Coetzee’s In the Heart of the Country (1977), Antjie Krog’s Country of My Skull (1998), and A.H.M. Scholtz’s Vatmaar (1995), also show a keen awareness of English’s role as an instrument of cultural imperialism. They are not composed in, or translated into, English in an attempt to distance themselves from complicity so much as to reveal it. They also speak of the opportunities writing in a hybridized English, or in a mixture of English and Afrikaans, offers to those who wish to describe intimacies “gained”, “resisted”, “uninvited” or “ignored” in opposition to apartheid (Nuttall, 2009: 1). As Afrikaans-speaking writers writing in English and vice versa, Coetzee, Krog, and Scholtz complicate the relationship between language and identity that apartheid sought to codify and secure and which local and global literary markets often reinforce. Their texts tend to offer linguistic hybridity, if not always as a practice, at least as an ideal in the pursuit of which such fixed categories are destabilized, and the folded-togetherness of South African languages and identities can be realized in textual and material terms. In considering the interaction of textual studies, literary studies, and print culture around questions of translation and translingualism in South Africa, it is hoped that we might create more space for the publication and critical reception of texts that re-fashion national and personal histories in radically productive ways
Art · Complicity · Hybridity · Linguistics · Literature · Narrative · Opposition (politics · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Anthropology · History · Law · Legal Issues in South Africa · Philosophy · Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies · South African History and Culture
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,08 |
| Citation span | 2013 - 2013 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |