Augmentation and Undermining from Combining Activities
The Role of Choice in Activity Engagement Theory
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9006399 |
|---|---|
| Authors | E Tory Higgins (0000-0003-4157-8207, Columbia University, corresponding author), Yaacov Trope (0000-0003-1448-1960, New York University), Joonmo Kwon |
| Year | 1999 |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 285-307 |
| Publication date | 1999-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-1031 • E-ISSN: 1096-0465 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1006/jesp.1999.1384 |
| OpenAlex | W2019224731 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 39 |
How does combining activities and freely choosing between them increase or decrease subsequent interest in them? In an extenstion of activity engagement theory (Higgins & Trope, 1990), we propose that an identified activity is associated with an approach or avoidance orientation that serves as a reference point for making evaluative inferences about engagement choices. People make inferences that are informative, i.e., that provide information beyond what is already known. Because people expect to approach a liked activity, choosing not to approach is more informative than choosing to approach. When people forsake a liked activity for another activity, therefore, they infer that the forsaken activity is not so positive. Thus, switching back and forth between two liked activities candecreasesubsequent interest in them. Because people expect to avoid a disliked activity, choosing not to avoid is more informative than choosing to avoid. When people choose a disliked activity instead of another activity, therefore, they infer that the chosen activity is not so negative. Thus, switching back and forth between two disliked activities canincreasesubsequent interest in them. We describe previous research and present new research that supports each of these predictions. We then consider other ways in which combining activities can undermine or enhance interest depending on how engagement choices are represented
Activity Theory · Biology and political orientation · Cognitive psychology · Developmental psychology · Orientation (vector space · Point (geometry · Politics · Trope (literature · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology
Handbook of motivation and cognition
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Human cognition in its social context.
How shall a thing be called?
From Acts To Dispositions The Attribution Process In Person Perception
Self-Perception Theory
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior
The psychology of interpersonal relations.
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
The endogenous-exogenous partition in attribution theory
Communicator effectiveness in producing public conformity and private attitude change 1
The effects of extrinsic incentive on some qualitative aspects of task performance 1
Microcomputers in education
Personality and behavior disorders
Overjustification, competing responses, and the acquisition of intrinsic interest
Effects of instruction on intrinsic interest
Affect and the overjustification effect
Aggression and heat
Cognitive dissonance and psychotherapy
An experimental analysis of self-persuasion
Beyond pleasure and pain
Marital interaction
Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward
Once a boring task always a boring task? Interest as a self-regulatory mechanism
Consequences of superfluous social constraints
Increasing intrinsic interest with superfluous extrinsic constraints
When combining intrinsic motivations undermines interest
Salience of reward and intrinsic motivation
Performance evaluation and intrinsic motivation
Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation
Cognitive consequences of forced compliance
Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,22 |
| Citation span | 1999 - 2018 (20) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |