Dominance through the lens of a competitive worldview
The role of relationship expectancies
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9007993 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Dean Baltiansky (0000-0002-6537-8384, Columbia University, corresponding author), Daniel R Ames (0000-0002-4630-5956, Columbia University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 124 |
| Pages | 104881-104881 |
| Publication date | 2026-01-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-1031 • E-ISSN: 1096-0465 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jesp.2026.104881 |
| OpenAlex | W7124545920 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 39 |
Who behaves dominantly—and why? Much compelling prior research spotlights motivational sources. We focus here on beliefs, proposing that people are less likely to behave dominantly when they expect dominance to incur greater relationship costs. We posit that this situation-specific expectancy is shaped by a general competitive worldview, seeing the social world as a “competitive jungle.” In five preregistered studies, we tested whether those with a competitive worldview expected dominance to incur less relationship harm and whether expected relationship harm predicted dominance. In Study 1 ( N = 275), part- and full-time workers completed widely used scales of dominance and worldviews, allowing us to test our predicted effects and alternatives. Study 2 ( N = 289) shifted from scales to employee-recounted acts of real-world managerial dominance. Studies 3A and 3B ( N = 1192) featured a novel paradigm for capturing behavioral dominance, with participants role-playing as managers and employees in an incentive-compatible design. Study 4 ( N = 492) manipulated expectancies to test their impact on behavior. We found support for our predictions across our studies, showing that a competitive worldview shaped relationship expectancies and that those who expected less relational damage from dominance were more likely to endorse or enact dominant behavior. These results emerged controlling for various motivational measures (e.g., relationship concern) and other expectancies (e.g., expected compliance), supporting a belief-based account of dominance that complements past work on motivational sources. Exploratory analyses suggested that those behaving dominantly may underestimate relational harm whereas those eschewing dominance may sometimes overestimate it
Dominance (genetics · Expectancy theory · Exploratory research · Harm · Social dominance orientation · Social relation · Test (biology · Cultural Differences and Values · Psychology of Social Influence · Social Power and Status Dynamics
Dominance and prestige as differential predictors of aggression and testosterone levels in men
At Least Bias Is Bipartisan
Pride, personality, and the evolutionary foundations of human social status
When the Boss Feels Inadequate
Dominance and Prestige
The Johnson-Neyman Technique, its Theory and Application
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
The evolution of prestige
Probing Interactions in Fixed and Multilevel Regression
The interactive relationship of competitive climate and trait competitiveness with workplace attitudes, stress, and performance
Dangerous and competitive worldviews
The precautious nature of prestige
Savvy or savage? How worldviews shape appraisals of antagonistic leaders
Assertiveness expectancies
Being a tough person in a tight world
Considering the role of second-order respect in individuals' deference to dominant actors
The Impact of Social Threat on Worldview and Ideological Attitudes
Power and the objectification of social targets
Two ways to the top
Negotiating gender roles
The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice
Theories of power
Divide and conquer
Cynical people desire power but rarely acquire it
The dominance behavioral system and psychopathology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |