The comparative effectiveness of different models of permanent supportive housing on problematic substance use, depression, and anxiety symptoms over time
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9053716 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Julia Dickson‐gómez (0000-0002-9388-847X, Medical College of Wisconsin), Timothy L Mcauliffe (0000-0002-9390-3959, Medical College of Wisconsin), Timothy McAuliffe, K G Quinn (0000-0003-0613-327X, Medical College of Wisconsin), Katherine Quinn (0009-0008-7452-8488), Antoinette L Spector (0000-0002-5821-7881, Medical College of Wisconsin), Peter Toepfer (National Center for Healthy Housing), Arturo Bendixen (National Center for Healthy Housing), Wayne Difranceisco (0000-0002-0907-1011, Medical College of Wisconsin) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 91 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 514-523 |
| Publication date | 2021-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of Orthopsychiatry (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-9432 • E-ISSN: 1939-0025 |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1037/ort0000550 |
| PMID | 33939448 |
| OpenAlex | W3159715593 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 13 |
OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of different models of permanent supportive housing (PSH), housing configuration, and service provision model on substance use, depression, and anxiety symptoms among residents over time. METHODS: Linear mixed model regression was used with 888 residents of PSH to investigate the relationship between supportive housing type, service model, and housing configuration and change in mental health and substance use at baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-month follow-up. RESULTS: There were few significant differences in problematic substance use, depression, or anxiety symptoms among those in different PSH types, different housing configuration models, or different service provision models. Similarly, there were no significant differences in PSH type, housing configuration, or service delivery model among those with severe mental illness (SMI), substance use disorder (SUD), or those with dual diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: There is little evidence that different models of PSH result in differences in mental health and substance use outcomes. Future research should consider the number of services clients receive and critical periods in PSH residency in improving mental health and substance use outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)
Anxiety · Depression (economics) · Dual diagnosis · Housing First · MEDLINE · Mental health · Mental illness · Multilevel model · Psychiatry · PsycINFO · Substance abuse · Substance use · Supportive housing · Clinical Psychology · Homelessness and Social Issues · Korean Urban and Social Studies · Medicine · Psychology · Urban Green Space and Health
Effect of Scattered-Site Housing Using Rent Supplements and Intensive Case Management on Housing Stability Among Homeless Adults With Mental Illness
An Improved Diagnostic Evaluation Instrument for Substance Abuse Patients
A Multiple-City RCT of Housing First With Assertive Community Treatment for Homeless Canadians With Serious Mental Illness
Cost-effectiveness of Supported Housing for Homeless Persons With Mental Illness
What is "Support" in Supportive Housing
Randomized Trial of the Effects of Housing Assistance on the Health and Risk Behaviors of Homeless and Unstably Housed People Living with HIV
Supportive housing for chronically homeless individuals
Availability of comprehensive services in permanent supportive housing in Los Angeles
Housing First, Consumer Choice, and Harm Reduction for Homeless Individuals With a Dual Diagnosis
Housing Retention in Single-Site Housing First for Chronically Homeless Individuals With Severe Alcohol Problems
The Health Impact of Supportive Housing for HIV-Positive Homeless Patients
Housing as a Platform for Health and Equity
Identifying variability in permanent supportive housing
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |