Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Typographic Hegemony and Bibliographical Monoculture

The Ascendancy of Mechanical Print in Modern Korea

Bibliographic Data

ID9076739
AuthorsHwisong Cho (0009-0000-4709-5332, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume58
Issue2
Pages242-264
Publication date2024-11-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Social History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-4529 • E-ISSN: 1527-1897
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/jsh/shae039
OpenAlexW4401308015
LanguageEN

This article explores how “Western” mechanical printing figured prominently in the expansion of imperialists’ interests in turn-of-the-twentieth-century Korea as both the main technological imperative and the hegemonic discourse. Negotiating and compromising with the native practices and deep history of print in Korea, the implantation of industrial printing fundamentally transformed the country’s literary cultures and epistemology. All participants in this change—Christian missionaries, Japanese colonizers, and Korean intellectuals—contributed to the domination of typography that gave rise to the circulation of printed matter on an unprecedented scale, which brought about the wide usage of the easy Korean alphabet and expanded readership even by women and nonelites. The discourse centering on typography as the symbol of modernity and progress also led the imperialists to redefine and recategorize Korean antiquarian books. The practices and projects that developed, such as Japanese collectors’ cannibalization of Korean books to put together imperial albums or binding Korean editions in Western styles, mirrored the colonial body politics that rendered the colonized inferior subjects in the material dimension. Typographic domination was vital to imperialists’ expansion in Korea not simply because it helped disseminate their ideas to Korean readers but also because it subordinated Korean written culture to the one introduced by the imperialist powers. More important, the typographic domination engineered by Japanese colonialists became so naturalized as to continue and shape the field of bibliography in postcolonial Korea, in what can be best described as bibliographical monoculture

Aesthetics · Art · Art history · Audience measurement · Colonialism · Hegemony · History of the book · Linguistics · Literature · Marginalia · Media studies · Modernity · Modernization theory · Political science · Politics · Print culture · Sociology · Symbol (formal) · Typography · Vernacular · Visual arts · Asian Culture and Media Studies · History · Japanese History and Culture · Law · Philosophy

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae