Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Controlling Costs Without Compromising Quality

Paying Hospitals for Total Knee Replacement

Bibliographic Data

ID9096328
AuthorsMichael Pine (Michael & Associates, corresponding author), Donald E Fry (0000-0002-5308-1671, Northwestern University, corresponding author), Barbara L Jones (0000-0002-8214-7019, corresponding author), Roger J Meimban (corresponding author), Gregory J Pine, Gregory Pine (corresponding author)
Year2010
Volume48
Issue10
Pages862-868
Publication date2010-10-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0b013e3181eb3176
PMID20808259
OpenAlexW1996143982
LanguageEN
References cited17

BACKGROUND: Unit costs of health services are substantially higher in the United States than in any other developed country in the world, without a correspondingly healthier population. An alternative payment structure, especially for high volume, high cost episodes of care (eg, total knee replacement), is needed to reward high quality care and reduce costs. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample of administrative claims data was used to measure risk-adjusted mortality, postoperative length-of-stay, costs of routine care, adverse outcome rates, and excess costs of adverse outcomes for total knee replacements performed between 2002 and 2005. Empirically identified inefficient and ineffective hospitals were then removed to create a reference group of high-performance hospitals. Predictive models for outcomes and costs were recalibrated to the reference hospitals and used to compute risk-adjusted outcomes and costs for all hospitals. Per case predicted costs were computed and compared with observed costs. RESULTS: Of the 688 hospitals with acceptable data, 62 failed to meet effectiveness criteria and 210 were identified as inefficient. The remaining 416 high-performance hospitals had 13.4% fewer risk-adjusted adverse outcomes (4.56%-3.95%; P < 0.001; χ) and 9.9% lower risk-adjusted total costs ($12,773-$11,512; P < 0.001; t test) than all study hospitals. Inefficiency accounted for 96% of excess costs. CONCLUSIONS: A payment system based on the demonstrated performance of effective, efficient hospitals can produce sizable cost savings without jeopardizing quality. In this study, 96% of total excess hospital costs resulted from higher routine costs at inefficient hospitals, whereas only 4% was associated with ineffective care

Adverse effect · Business · Environmental health · Health care · Inefficiency · Operations management · Payment · Population · Total cost · Emergency Medicine · Finance · Healthcare Policy and Management · Medicine · Primary Care and Health Outcomes · Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes

  • Methods for Analyzing Health Care Utilization and Costs

    Paula Diehr, David Yanez et al.•Annual Review of Public Health•1999

  • Empirically Derived Composite Measures of Surgical Performance

    Douglas O Staiger, Justin B Dimick et al.•Medical Care•2009

  • Comorbidity Measures for Use with Administrative Data

    Anne Elixhauser, Claudia Steiner et al.•Medical Care•1998

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae