Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Differences in Health Values Among Patients, Family Members, and Providers for Outcomes in Schizophrenia

Bibliographic Data

ID9100151
AuthorsLeslie A Lenert, Leslie Lenert (0000-0002-9680-5094, VA San Diego Healthcare System, corresponding author), Jennifer Ziegler, Tina Lee (0000-0002-5284-7751), Roger Sommi, Roger W Sommi (0000-0001-8110-8467), Ramy Mahmoud (0000-0002-6853-1524)
Year2000
Volume38
Issue10
Pages1011-1021
Publication date2000-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/00005650-200010000-00005
PMID11021674
OpenAlexW2074430920
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited31

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to determine whether there are important differences in how patients, family members, and health care providers (HCPs) value health outcomes in schizophrenia and to assess the degree to which such differences, if they exist, could adversely affect clinical and policy decision making. METHODS: Participants viewed videotaped depictions of simulated patients with mild and moderate symptoms of schizophrenia, with and without a common adverse drug effect (pseudoparkinsonism), and then provided standard gamble and visual analog scale ratings of desirability of these states. SUBJECTS: A convenience sample of unrelated patients (n = 148), family members of patients (n = 91), and HCPs (nurses, psychologists, doctors of pharmacy, and doctors of medicine; n = 99) was drawn from geographically and clinically diverse environments. RESULTS: Patients' and family members' utilities for health states averaged 0.1 to 0.15 units higher than those of HCPs (P <0.002 for differences between groups, ANOVA for multiple observations). The disutility of adverse drug effects was less for health professionals than patients and family members (P = 0.008). Health professionals tended to prefer states with mild symptoms with extrapyramidal side effects to states with moderate symptoms. Patients and family members found these states equally preferable (P <0.007 for differences between groups). CONCLUSIONS: There are systematic differences in values for health outcomes between patients and HCPs with regard to states with adverse effects of antipsychotic drugs. Family members of patients in general had values that were more similar to those of patients than were those of health professionals. The results emphasize the importance of participation by patients (or family member proxies) in clinical decision making and guideline development

Adverse effect · Affect (linguistics) · Family medicine · Family member · Health care · Psychiatry · Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming) · Clinical Psychology · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Mental Health and Psychiatry · Pharmacy · Psychology · Schizophrenia research and treatment

  • Testing subject comprehension of utility questionnaires

    Open Access•Deborah G Dobrez, Deborah Dobrez et al.•Quality of Life Research•2004

  • “If you have the flu symptoms, your asymptomatic spouse may better answer the willingness-to-pay question”

    Open Access•Michaël Schwarzinger, Fabrice Carrat et al.•Journal of Health Economics•2009

  • The disutility of tooth loss

    Open Access•Elizabeth Kay, Elizabeth Jane Kay et al.•Journal of Public Health Dentistry•2013

  • Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine

    Marthe R Gold, Joanna E Siegel et al.•Cost-effectiveness in health and…•1996

  • Patterns of Usual Care for Schizophrenia

    Anthony F Lehman, D M Steinwachs et al.•Schizophrenia Bulletin•1998

  • Methodology for measuring health-state preferences—II

    Open Access•Debra G Froberg, Robert L Kane•Journal of Clinical Epidemiology•1989

  • The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for Schizophrenia

    Stanley R Kay, Abraham Fiszbein et al.•Schizophrenia Bulletin•1987

  • Zidovudine adherence among individuals with HIV infection

    Richard D Muma, Michael W Ro et al.•AIDS Care•1995

  • The effect of assessment method and respondent population on utilities elicited for Gaucher Disease

    Open Access•Ann E Clarke, M K Goldstein et al.•Quality of Life Research•1997

  • Measurement of the Validity of Utility Elicitations Performed by Computerized Interview

    L A Lenert, Leslie Lenert et al.•Medical Care•1997

  • Methodological Issues of Patient Utility Measurement Experience From Two Clinical Trials

    MAUREEN MAUREEN, RUTTEN-VAN MÖLKEN et al.•Medical Care•1995

  • Associations Between Health Status and Utilities Implications for Policy

    Leslie A Lenert, Leslie Lenert et al.•Medical Care•1999

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,14
Citation span2004 - 2013 (10)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae