Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Using Diagnoses to Estimate Health Care Cost Risk in Canada

Bibliographic Data

ID9100633
AuthorsYin Li (0000-0003-0838-5374, Ministry of Health and Long Term Care), Sharada Weir (0000-0002-3206-6034, Ministry of Health and Long Term Care), Mitch Steffler (Ministry of Health and Long Term Care), Shaun Shaikh (0000-0002-8280-7064, Ministry of Health and Long Term Care), James G Wright (0000-0002-7790-4660, Ministry of Health and Long Term Care), Jasmin Kantarevic (Ministry of Health and Long Term Care)
Year2019
Volume57
Issue11
Pages875-881
Publication date2019-11-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0000000000001203
PMID31567859
OpenAlexW2973325067
LanguageEN
References cited7

OBJECTIVE: Until recently, the options for summarizing Canadian patient complexity were limited to health risk predictive modeling tools developed outside of Canada. This study aims to validate a new model created by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) for Canada's health care environment. RESEARCH DESIGN: This was a cohort study. SUBJECTS: The rolling population eligible for coverage under Ontario's Universal Provincial Health Insurance Program in the fiscal years (FYs) 2006/2007-2016/2017 (12-13 million annually) comprised the subjects. MEASURES: To evaluate model performance, we compared predicted cost risk at the individual level, on the basis of diagnosis history, with estimates of actual patient-level cost using "out-of-the-box" cost weights created by running the CIHI software "as is." We next considered whether performance could be improved by recalibrating the model weights, censoring outliers, or adding prior cost. RESULTS: We were able to closely match model performance reported by CIHI for their 2010-2012 development sample (concurrent R=48.0%; prospective R=8.9%) and show that performance improved over time (concurrent R=51.9%; prospective R=9.7% in 2014-2016). Recalibrating the model did not substantively affect prospective period performance, even with the addition of prior cost and censoring of cost outliers. However, censoring substantively improved concurrent period explanatory power (from R=53.6% to 66.7%). CONCLUSIONS: We validated the CIHI model for 2 periods, FYs 2010/2011-2012/2013 and FYs 2014/2015-2016/2017. Out-of-the-box model performance for Ontario was as good as that reported by CIHI for the development sample based on 3-province data (British Columbia, Alberta, and Ontario). We found that performance was robust to variations in model specification, data sources, and time

Actuarial science · Business · Censoring (clinical trials) · Economics · Environmental health · Health care · Population · Chronic Disease Management Strategies · Demography · Medical Coding and Health Information · Medicine · Primary Care and Health Outcomes

  • Upcoding

    Michael Geruso, Timothy Layton•Journal of Political Economy•2019

  • Risk Adjustment Using Administrative Data-Based and Survey-Derived Methods for Explaining Physician Utilization

    Lyn M Sibley, Rahim Moineddin et al.•Medical Care•2010

  • Performance of the ACG Case-Mix System in Two Canadian Provinces

    Robert J Reid, Leonard Macwilliam et al.•Medical Care•2001

  • Using the Johns Hopkins Aggregated Diagnosis Groups (ADGs) to Predict Mortality in a General Adult Population Cohort in Ontario, Canada

    Peter C Austin, Carl van Walraven et al.•Medical Care•2011

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae