Improvements in Medicare Part D Risk Adjustment
Beneficiary Access and Payment Accuracy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9101240 |
|---|---|
| Authors | John Kautter (0000-0002-2530-4727, RTI International), Melvin J Ingber (0000-0003-4848-932X, RTI International), Melvin Ingber, Gregory C Pope (0000-0003-2274-7095, RTI International), Sara Freeman (0000-0002-7300-4024, RTI International) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue | 12 |
| Pages | 1102-1108 |
| Publication date | 2012-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Publisher | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/mlr.0b013e318269eb20 |
| PMID | 22922436 |
| OpenAlex | W2043903914 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 2 |
INTRODUCTION: The continued success of the Medicare Part D program is contingent on appropriate Medicare payment adjustments for the projected drug costs of Part D plan enrollees. This article describes a major revision of these "risk adjustments," intended to more accurately match payments to costs, especially for high-cost, disadvantaged populations. METHODS: For the first time actual Part D data are used to calibrate risk adjustment. The sample is Medicare beneficiaries with fee-for-service enrollment in 2007 and Part D standalone prescription drug plan enrollment in 2008 (N = 14,224,301). Part D plan liability expenditures are predicted using demographic and diagnostic factors in a weighted least squares regression. Models for Medicare subpopulations are analyzed. The predictive accuracy of risk adjustment models is evaluated using R and predictive ratio statistics. RESULTS: Based on differences in both mean expenditures and incremental expenditures by diagnosis, separate Part D risk adjustment models are calibrated for 5 Medicare subpopulations: aged not low income; aged low income; nonaged not low income; nonaged low income; and institutionalized. The variation in plan liability drug expenditures (R) explained by these models ranges from 13% to 29%. The 5 separate models accurately predict mean plan liability expenditures ranging from $967 to $1762 across subpopulations and account for differences in incremental disease coefficients by subpopulation. CONCLUSIONS: The refined Part D risk adjustment model represents a significant improvement in the accuracy and fairness of payment to Part D plans. The new model provides greater incentives for drug plans to compete for low-income and institutionalized enrollees
Actuarial science · Disadvantaged · Economics · Liability · Medical prescription · Medicare Part D · Payment · Prescription drug · Finance · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Healthcare Policy and Management · Medication Adherence and Compliance · Medicine
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |