Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Improvements in Medicare Part D Risk Adjustment

Beneficiary Access and Payment Accuracy

Bibliographic Data

ID9101240
AuthorsJohn Kautter (0000-0002-2530-4727, RTI International), Melvin J Ingber (0000-0003-4848-932X, RTI International), Melvin Ingber, Gregory C Pope (0000-0003-2274-7095, RTI International), Sara Freeman (0000-0002-7300-4024, RTI International)
Year2012
Volume50
Issue12
Pages1102-1108
Publication date2012-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0b013e318269eb20
PMID22922436
OpenAlexW2043903914
LanguageEN
References cited2

INTRODUCTION: The continued success of the Medicare Part D program is contingent on appropriate Medicare payment adjustments for the projected drug costs of Part D plan enrollees. This article describes a major revision of these "risk adjustments," intended to more accurately match payments to costs, especially for high-cost, disadvantaged populations. METHODS: For the first time actual Part D data are used to calibrate risk adjustment. The sample is Medicare beneficiaries with fee-for-service enrollment in 2007 and Part D standalone prescription drug plan enrollment in 2008 (N = 14,224,301). Part D plan liability expenditures are predicted using demographic and diagnostic factors in a weighted least squares regression. Models for Medicare subpopulations are analyzed. The predictive accuracy of risk adjustment models is evaluated using R and predictive ratio statistics. RESULTS: Based on differences in both mean expenditures and incremental expenditures by diagnosis, separate Part D risk adjustment models are calibrated for 5 Medicare subpopulations: aged not low income; aged low income; nonaged not low income; nonaged low income; and institutionalized. The variation in plan liability drug expenditures (R) explained by these models ranges from 13% to 29%. The 5 separate models accurately predict mean plan liability expenditures ranging from $967 to $1762 across subpopulations and account for differences in incremental disease coefficients by subpopulation. CONCLUSIONS: The refined Part D risk adjustment model represents a significant improvement in the accuracy and fairness of payment to Part D plans. The new model provides greater incentives for drug plans to compete for low-income and institutionalized enrollees

Actuarial science · Disadvantaged · Economics · Liability · Medical prescription · Medicare Part D · Payment · Prescription drug · Finance · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Healthcare Policy and Management · Medication Adherence and Compliance · Medicine

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae